earlier US hesitation (particularly during what he describes as genocidal massacres of Iranian protesters in January 2026) destroyed Iranian goodwill toward America and made a future post-Islamic Iran an inevitable adversary of the United States Government.
Jorjani has been posting frequently in late 2026 about the possibility of the United States becoming more heavily involved in conflict with Iran (which he refers to as a resumption of the “Iran War”).
In a 5 November 2026 post he speculated that if the war resumed it could happen that weekend, with Israel striking heavily in the first two weeks and the US then conducting a sustained bombing campaign for up to two months aimed at toppling the Islamic Republic. He linked this to Republicans seeking tangible results after an election and predicted it would accelerate the regime’s irreversible collapse between 2027 and 2028, with a new government emerging by 2029.[](<https://x.com/Jason_Jorjani/status/2118369278265057448>)
He has also warned Americans to prepare for retaliatory attacks on the US power grid in such a scenario, potentially leaving large areas without electricity, heating or pumped water for weeks and rendering bank and crypto accounts inaccessible. He has stated that Iran already possesses nuclear weapons but that they will not be used in the conflict, nor will Iran face nuclear strikes.[](<https://x.com/Jason_Jorjani/status/2114098320486650104>)
More broadly, he argues that earlier US hesitation (particularly during what he describes as genocidal massacres of Iranian protesters in January 2026) destroyed Iranian goodwill toward America and made a future post-Islamic Iran an inevitable adversary of the United States Government. He frames any US-led campaign as too late, strategically self-destructive for America, and ultimately conducive to the rise of a more powerful nationalist Iranian state.[](<https://x.com/Jason_Jorjani/status/2108614592041714117>)
These are Jorjani’s public, highly speculative statements; they mix geopolitical commentary with his longer-standing Promethean and Iranian-nationalist framework.
Francisco Gil-White has long argued that US policy consistently protects the Iranian regime rather than advancing Israeli security against it. He points to a pattern, across administrations, of forced ceasefires when Israel was making gains, historical secret support for the ayatollahs, and diplomacy that leaves the Islamic Republic in place.[](<https://franciscogilwhite.substack.com/p/israel-strikes-iran-is-trump-trying-to-save-the-ayatollahs>)
Jorjani’s recent statements track the same basic claim from a different angle. He has repeatedly said the Trump administration imposed “no-kill lists,” refused to back Iranian protesters decisively during the January 2026 crackdowns, and preferred deals that kept the Islamic Republic intact rather than allowing regime change. In his view this both betrayed the Iranian people and undercut Israel’s longer-term strategic interest in a post-Islamic Iran as an ally. He has gone further, describing the outcome as destructive for both Israel and the United States.[](<https://x.com/Jason_Jorjani/status/2067049705398509803>)
The two converge on the practical point that American policy toward Iran has not prioritised eliminating or fully containing the regime in a way that would serve Israeli security. Gil-White frames it as a decades-long structural feature of US strategy; Jorjani treats the most recent episodes as a decisive betrayal of the Iran–Israel alignment he once advocated. The shared observation is that US actions have repeatedly limited Israel’s freedom of action against the Iranian regime.
תגובות