In essence, the talk reframes the pyramids not as pharaonic tombs but as ancient, pre-flood megastructures built by a Cain-descended, possibly semi-divine king to safeguard civilization's knowledge against an apocalyptic reset.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=18JLC5g1QW0&pp=0gcJCTIBo7VqN5tD
Here are the core ideas from Harald Lanta's talk "Saurids Pyramiden - war Kains Vorvater ein Halbgott?":
- Mainstream Egyptology insists the Giza pyramids were built ~4,500 years ago as tombs for pharaohs (e.g., Cheops/Khufu), but this rests on weak assumptions, contradictions (e.g., construction timelines vs. reign lengths), and no direct archaeological proof for the methods or pre-dynastic advanced knowledge.
- The pyramids likely served much broader purposes: encoding mathematical constants, storing pre-catastrophe knowledge, aligning with stars/constellations, possibly functioning as energy devices, or built by non-human/extraterrestrial help; many were left unfinished due to disasters.
- Arabic medieval sources (especially Al-Maqrizi's "Hitat" and others like al-Suyuti, al-Mas'udi) describe the pyramids as built by a pre-flood king named Saurid (also Surid, Shurid, Saurit), who ruled long before the known Egyptian dynasties.
- Saurid had prophetic dreams/visions of an impending Great Flood and celestial catastrophe (falling stars/fire from the Leo constellation), so he ordered the pyramids constructed centuries earlier as secure archives/repositories to preserve all human wisdom, sciences, and warnings for post-flood survivors.
- Saurid is portrayed as a legendary figure from the early generations after Adam (e.g., 17th–18th generation in some lists), living hundreds of years, ruling ~190 years pre-flood, and possibly buried in one of the pyramids.
- Strong connection to biblical/ apocryphal traditions: Saurid descends from Cain's lineage; some interpretations suggest Cain himself or his immediate descendants had semi-divine/heavenly origins (e.g., from unions involving serpent-angel figures or "sons of God"), making Saurid potentially a demigod or hybrid being.
- The flood itself is tied to moral corruption and sins stemming from Cain's descendants (e.g., incest, forbidden knowledge), with Saurid acting as a preserver inspired by divine or higher forces.
- Egyptologists dismiss these Arabic legends as folklore or misidentifications (e.g., Surid = Cheops), but Lanta argues this is dogmatic bias that ignores consistent pre-flood flood warnings across cultures and undervalues non-Egyptian historical texts.
- Speculative dating: One astronomical alignment described in the legends corresponds to ~9402 BCE, supporting a much older origin tied to a global cataclysm.
Overview of the TalkThe video is alecture titled "Saurids Pyramiden - war Kains Vorvater ein Halbgott?" (Saurid's Pyramids - Was Cain's Ancestor a Demigod?) delivered by Dipl.-Ing. Harald Lanta at the ONE DAY MEETING of the A.A.S. (Forschungsgesellschaft für Archäologie, Astronautik und SETI),
an organization focused on archaeology, ancient astronauts, and SETI. The talk, hosted on the Hangar18b YouTube channel, lasts about 37 minutes and delves into alternative theories about the Giza Pyramids. Lanta challenges mainstream Egyptology, drawing on ancient legends, biblical references, and speculative history to suggest the pyramids were built by a pre-flood king named Saurit (or variants like Surid/Shurid), possibly a demigod linked to biblical Cain. The presentation mixes archaeology, mythology, pre-astronautics (ancient alien theories), and critiques of academic dogma. It's aimed at audiences interested in UFOs, ancient mysteries, and forbidden archaeology.The talk is structured around questioning official narratives, exploring Arabic and biblical sources, and proposing connections to cataclysmic events like the Great Flood. Lanta uses slides with quotes from Egyptologists (highlighted in green for supportive claims and red for admissions of uncertainty) to highlight inconsistencies. He emphasizes ignored historical texts and ends with a call for open-minded research.Key Sections and BreakdownI'll unpack the talk chronologically based on its main segments, translating and explaining the content in English. This includes the speaker's arguments, evidence cited, and implications. Timestamps are approximate from the transcript.Introduction and Greeting (0:00 - 1:00)
- Content: The talk opens with music, followed by Lanta greeting the audience. He humorously notes that the previous speaker set a high bar and hopes he can contribute meaningfully.
- Unpacking: This sets a light, engaging tone for a controversial topic, signaling it's part of a conference on fringe theories.
- Content: Lanta outlines the mainstream view: The Egyptian pyramids were built around 4,500 years ago as tombs for pharaohs. However, he lists alternative ideas, such as the pyramids encoding mathematical constants, serving as archives of knowledge before a great flood, aligning with star constellations, being built by extraterrestrials, functioning as energy generators, or remaining unfinished due to catastrophes.
- Unpacking: Here, Lanta introduces skepticism toward "official" history. He argues that if you ask 100 people who built the Great Pyramid, 99 will give the standard answer, but it's based on assumptions. This segment frames the pyramids not as simple tombs but as multifunctional enigmas, appealing to ancient alien enthusiasts.
- Content: Lanta cites books by Egyptologists like Alberto Siliotti (pyramids as royal tombs) and Reiner Stadelmann (pyramids as state metaphors). Green quotes support the tomb theory, but red ones admit gaps (e.g., Stadelmann: "We only have assumptions"). Wikipedia calls them tombs, but theories are unproven. He references Herodotus (claiming 20 years for construction plus 10 for roads), but notes contradictions with pharaoh reigns (e.g., Cheops ruled at most 24 years).
- Unpacking: This is the core critique: Egyptology relies on unverified claims and ignores anomalies. Lanta portrays academics as dogmatic, using color-coded quotes to visually demonstrate hypocrisy. It builds the case that the tomb theory is a "house of cards" without solid evidence.
- Content: Shifting to alternative sources, Lanta discusses Arabic legends where pyramids were built by figures like Prophet Idris (Hermes/Enoch), the hero Shadad, or King Saurit before the Great Flood. He focuses on Al-Maqrizi's 15th-century "Hitat," a mix of science and folklore. Al-Maqrizi cites sources claiming Saurit dreamed of a flood and falling stars, then built the pyramids 300 years earlier as knowledge repositories.
- Unpacking: Saurit is presented as a legendary pre-dynastic king, not a pharaoh. This draws from medieval Arabic historiography, which Lanta argues is dismissed by modern scholars. The pyramids shift from tombs to "arks" preserving wisdom from a cataclysm, aligning with flood myths worldwide.
- Content: Mainstream experts like Stadelmann call these "folk fantasies," and Zahi Hawass denies civilizations before 3200 BCE. Mark Lehner links Surid to Cheops. Erich von Däniken (ancient aliens theorist) portrays Saurit as a demigod inspired by God to build before the flood.
- Unpacking: Lanta accuses Egyptology of bias, ignoring non-Egyptian sources. He uses von Däniken to bridge to extraterrestrial or divine intervention, suggesting Saurit had advanced knowledge possibly from "gods" (aliens or angels).
- Content: Linking to the Bible (Genesis), Lanta recounts Cain killing Abel and being exiled. From apocryphal texts like "Legends of the Jews" by Louis Ginzberg, Cain is depicted as a heavenly son (from Eve and a serpent-angel), with a twin sister and incest accusations. The "Testament of Adam" blames the flood on sins from Cain's daughters. 19th-century author von Ditfurth suggests Saurit descended from Cain's line and built the pyramids.
- Unpacking: This is the title's core: Was Cain's ancestor a demigod? Lanta connects Saurit to Cain via Nephilim (biblical giants from angel-human unions). It implies pyramids as products of hybrid beings, blending biblical literalism with ancient astronaut theory. The flood is a reset due to these "sins."
- Content: Citing Arabic historians like al-Suyuti and al-Mas'udi: Saurit/Surid built pyramids before the flood, 17 generations after Adam. Turkic writer Kaitip Mohammed Saim provides similar lists. Al-Qalqashandi (15th century): Saurit as the 18th generation; his son built them. Ibrahim Wasif Shah: Saurit ruled 190 years, lived 300 years pre-flood, buried in a pyramid.
- Unpacking: These genealogies place Saurit in a pre-flood era, far older than Egyptian dynasties (e.g., 10,000+ BCE). Lanta argues this timeline fits cataclysm theories, with pyramids as survivors of lost civilizations.
- Content: Saurit remains mythical and doesn't fit official chronologies. Lanta criticizes narrow academic publishing. Lost sources due to disasters. Astronomical evidence: A planetary alignment (Sun/Moon in Aries, planets in Pisces) dates to January 20, 9402 BCE (amateur research, viewed skeptically). Quotes: "Stupidity never goes out of style" (Ernst Förster); "Dreamers change the world" (Erich von Däniken).
- Unpacking: The talk ends optimistically, urging reevaluation of history. The astro-dating suggests pyramids commemorate a flood event, supporting Graham Hancock-style alternative timelines. Lanta positions himself as a "dreamer" against rigid science.
- Content: Applause and thanks from Lanta.
- Unpacking: Reinforces the conference's collaborative, exploratory spirit.
- Central Thesis: The Giza Pyramids weren't built by pharaohs like Cheops as tombs but by a pre-flood demigod-king Saurit, possibly linked to Cain's lineage, to preserve knowledge from a catastrophe. This involves Nephilim, aliens, or divine beings.
- Evidence Style: Mix of historical texts (Arabic chronicles, Bible, apocrypha), critiques of experts, and speculative astronomy. No hard proof, but Lanta highlights overlooked sources.
- Critique of Academia: Egyptology is portrayed as closed-minded, favoring assumptions over mysteries.
- Appeal: For fans of ancient aliens (e.g., von Däniken), it connects dots across cultures. Skeptics might see it as pseudoscience, but Lanta encourages questioning.
- Limitations: Based on legends, not archaeology; ignores carbon dating aligning pyramids to ~2500 BCE.
תגובות