Historical and Modern Relations Between Armenians and Jews
Armenians and Jews share a long, multifaceted history marked by cultural parallels, shared traumas, and occasional tensions. Both groups have been described as ancient diasporic peoples with strong ethnic identities, experiences of persecution, and success as "model minorities" in host societies—such as in business, chess, and lobbying (e.g., in the U.S.). Comparisons often highlight the Armenian Genocide (1915–1923) and the Holocaust as defining 20th-century tragedies, with both seen as stateless nations until the modern era (Armenia in 1918, Israel in 1948). However, relations are complex, influenced by geopolitics, historical migrations, and recent conflicts.Early contacts trace back to antiquity. In the 1st century BCE, Armenian King Tigranes the Great reportedly settled thousands of Jews in Armenia after campaigns in Palestine. By the 4th century CE, Jewish communities existed in Armenian towns, with Hellenistic influences. A medieval Jewish cemetery in Yeghegis (Vayots Dzor region) dates to the 13th–14th centuries, evidencing long-term presence. Under Ottoman rule, Armenians and Jews were both "dhimmis" (protected minorities), interacting in trade but maintaining separate communities. Travelers like Aubry de La Motraye (1723) noted Armenians and Jews as more "honest" than Greeks in the empire. In the 19th century, "Jewish and Armenian Questions" emerged in European discourse, linked to minority rights amid nationalism. During the Armenian Genocide, some Jews aided Armenians, while others (notably "Young Turks" with alleged crypto-Jewish ties, like the Dönmeh) were implicated, though this is debated and often exaggerated in conspiratorial narratives. Post-genocide, Armenians and Jews bonded over survival; Armenians rescued Jews during the Holocaust, with figures like Pran Tashchiyan citing shared history as motivation. Modern relations are strained by Israel's non-recognition of the Armenian Genocide (to avoid alienating Turkey) and arms sales to Azerbaijan amid the Nagorno-Karabakh conflicts (2020, 2023). Armenia recalled its ambassador from Israel in 2020 over this. Armenia condemned the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack but has ties to Iran, complicating matters. Jewish communities in Armenia (e.g., in Yerevan) are small (around 790 in Jerusalem's Old City Armenian Quarter, historically). Some antisemitism exists, with incidents like synagogue attacks in Yerevan tied to anti-Israel sentiment during Karabakh wars. A 2014 ADL survey found 58% of Armenians held antisemitic views, higher than global averages, often linked to Holocaust comparisons or perceived Jewish influence. However, many Armenians express respect for Jews, citing shared values; personal accounts from visitors note warmth despite geopolitical issues. In Jerusalem's Armenian Quarter, Armenians and Jews have coexisted since the 4th century CE, predating Islam, with mutual protection under empires. On X (formerly Twitter), discussions reflect polarization: pro-Azerbaijan voices accuse Armenia of antisemitism (e.g., synagogue attacks), while others defend Armenians, noting Azeri war crimes and ethnic cleansing in Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh). Azerbaijan's Jewish community thrives, but critics argue this is used propagandistically. Overall, while tensions exist, shared history fosters alliances; some view Armenians and Jews as "cousins" due to parallel fates. Common Roots and the Hurrian ConnectionThe claim that Hurrians "merged into Jewish tribes" is partially supported by historical linguistics and archaeology but overstated. Hurrians were a non-Semitic, non-Indo-European people active in the 3rd–2nd millennia BCE, centered in northern Mesopotamia, Syria, and Anatolia (e.g., Mitanni kingdom). They influenced Hittites, Assyrians, and possibly early Hebrews through cultural diffusion, not direct merger.Biblical scholars link Hurrians to groups like the "Horites" (e.g., Genesis 36) or "Hivites" in Canaan, suggesting Hurrian names and customs in patriarchal narratives. Abraham's origins in Harran (northern Mesopotamia) place him in a Hurrian-influenced area; names like "Terah" or "Sarah" may have Hurrian roots. Some propose Horites intermarried with Esau's line (Edomites), but this is speculative. Hebrews (descended from Shem via Eber and Abraham) show Semitic roots with potential Hurrian cultural borrowings, like in Nuzi tablets (e.g., adoption customs mirroring Genesis). Armenians, however, are Indo-European speakers with origins in the Armenian Highlands, possibly linked to Urartu (a post-Hurrian state with some Hurrian linguistic substrate). No direct "common roots" via Hurrian merger into Jewish tribes; any overlap is regional, not ethnic. Fringe theories (e.g., Akans/Hebrews as Hurrian-Amorite-Horite mix) lack scholarly consensus. The Amalek Association and "Psyop" ClaimsThe idea that Armenians are "that Amalek" (biblical enemy of Jews, Exodus 17:14–16; Deuteronomy 25:17–19) appears in medieval Jewish texts, where "Armenia" is sometimes called "Amalek" (a Byzantine term adopted in chronicles like Josippon). This wasn't always negative; it might stem from linguistic confusion or historical rivalry (e.g., merchant competition). Some rabbis (e.g., Yosef Hayyim Sonnenfeld in 1898) identified Germans or others as Amalek, showing symbolic use. In Talmudic tradition, Amalek represents eternal enmity, applied variably (e.g., to Romans, Christians, Nazis, Palestinians). Modern claims of Armenians as Amalek are fringe, often in anti-Armenian propaganda (e.g., Azeri-Turkish contexts amid Karabakh disputes). No "decent scientific opinions" support this; Amalek's historical existence is debated, with no archaeological evidence. The "psyop to divide people with common roots" narrative fits conspiracy theories, but lacks substantiation—it's more a rhetorical device to highlight perceived manipulation in ethnic conflicts. Rabbinic discomfort with the "blot out Amalek" command (e.g., calls for reconciliation) counters genocidal interpretations. On X, Amalek rhetoric appears in extremist posts (e.g., linking to Palestinians or Europeans), but not mainstream Armenian-Jewish discourse. Yuri Sargsyan's Claims on DeitiesSearches for "Yuri Sargsyan" (or variants like Sargisyan) yield limited results; he may be an obscure author or alternative historian on Armenian mythology. The claims align with comparative mythology theories linking Sumerian/Akkadian gods to Iranian/Armenian and Jewish figures.
- Enki/Anokhi as Haya (חיה - "life," Hai): Enki (Sumerian water/wisdom god) influenced later deities. "Anokhi" echoes "Anu" (sky god) or biblical "Anochi" (Exodus 20:2, "I am"). Armenian "Hay" (from Hayk, legendary founder) means "Armenian"; "Haya" could be folk etymology linking to Hebrew "chaya" (life). No mainstream evidence of Armenians worshiping Enki directly, but Urartian/Hurrian influences included similar gods.
- Inanna/Esther as Anahita: Inanna (Sumerian love/war goddess) evolved into Ishtar/Astarte. Some scholars link Purim's Esther to Ishtar (e.g., via "star"). Anahita (Avestan water/fertility goddess) was adopted in Armenia as Anahit, likely borrowed during Achaemenid rule. Armenians revered Anahit as a major deity pre-Christianity (c. 301 CE). Parallels exist (e.g., fertility themes), but direct equation is speculative, common in syncretic studies.
תגובות