The Great Culling has begun: Will your genetic lineage survive?
·
"Eliminate the weak"
Modern eugenics
The great intelligence test
The game is on: You are living a reality game called "Survivor"
The 7 threats to your survival and fertility
The 10 strategies for beating the odds and winning the survivor game
Don't be a victim, be a survivor
Covid Vaccines and the Depopulation Program
Kevin Galalae
15 October 2021
The entire world is a theater of war. This is a war like no other for there is no formal declaration, no stated conflict, and no contending armies. Governments wage a silent and covert war against their own people because those who govern and the grave men directing them have determined that if we are to survive as a species no one on earth can be allowed to die of natural causes anymore but must instead die by government mandate. The weapons of mass destruction they chose to use in this war against our world are manipulation of knowledge, by our medical and scientific leaders; exploitation of trust, by our spiritual and intellectual leaders; and abuse of power, by our political, military and economic leaders. As inconceivable as this may sound, this is the easy part to swallow. The hard part is that this is a sane and sound decision. And the hardest part, which is impossible to digest, and should never be swallowed, is their refusal to tell us about it and their insistence that we must pretend we don’t know, lest we do not go gentle into that good night. Why would they take such a decision? Why is this decision sane and sound? Why do they refuse to tell us about it? How do they intend to cut everyone’s life short? And how and why we must prevent such an abominable outcome? These are the questions! And answer them I will. 1. Why would they take such a decision? For three reasons: first, because the developed world has reached the last stage of the demographic transition / depopulation program and, as such, has inverted population pyramids that are economically unsustainable – thus too many old people and too few young people to bear the burden of the old – and that unless stabilized will inevitably lead to financial collapse and a fall back into poverty. Second, because the developing world’s population is still growing and the planet cannot possibly provide the resources needed to keep the existing 8 billion people alive at a civilized and sustainable standard of living, let alone double this number in thirty years’ time, which is how long it takes the global population to double absent brutal population control methods. And third, because mankind’s current size and needs already outstrip the planet’s carrying capacity, thus the planet’s capacity to regenerate, and unless a state of equilibrium is reestablished between our civilization and nature we pose a global catastrophic risk to the survival of all life on Earth including our own. 2 2. Why is this decision sane and sound? For three reasons directly related to the three reasons above: first, having reached the last stage of the demographic transition and its inverted population pyramids, the young have to be saved from the burden of the old, which can only happen if lifespan is limited to at most 75 years and the old-age burden is reduced to below 20%, otherwise by 2060 every working person will have to support two pensioners, and that is economically and socially impossible. Cold logic dictates that the old and the chronically ill are therefore first in line to be prematurely killed. Second, to reach sustainability the global population must be reduced by about half according to the Overshoot Index and many other rational assessments of resources versus population, as we have already modified 75% of the Earth’s ice-free landmass, and that cannot happen sufficiently fast to avoid ecosystem collapse by employing legislative means of population reduction, even if such means were politically feasible. Reducing the global population by half by 2050 or even by 2100, if we could stave off ecological disaster for this long, can only be done by prematurely killing half the global population given the frailty and self-centeredness of human nature. The least intelligent, the weakest and the most ignoble human beings are therefore second in line to be eliminated, as these selection criteria leave mankind with the best human resources to progress as a civilization and to build a better, kinder and more equitable world. Third, since we already far exceed Earth’s carrying capacity and pose a global catastrophic risk to biodiversity and, indeed, to all life on Earth, it would be an act of collective suicide to passively wait for the inevitable end, which makes decisive action, thus committing controlled genocide, to reestablish equilibrium between mankind and nature, an existential imperative and the lesser of two evils. 3. Why do they refuse to tell us about it? Once again, for three reasons directly related to the three reasons above: first, most people lack the emotional and psychological strength to end their lives at 75 through assisted suicide, even if the legal framework for euthanasia existed, which is the case in only a handful of countries around the world. Second, hardly anyone, other than perhaps hardcore environmentalists and members of doomsday cults, would agree to sacrifice their own aspirations let alone voluntarily end their own lives to prevent environmental catastrophe or to help our civilization survive by reducing the global population by half, which would require four billion human beings to commit suicide. Third and last, modern man is no longer capable, emotionally and psychologically, of murdering in cold blood half of his kind, even if that were physically possible, especially at a time in our history when peaceful coexistence and human rights have seen violence decline and are the bedrock of most nations, and when any form of violence is scorned upon and criminally punished, and violence is bred out of children from an early age. 3 4. How do they intend to cut everyone’s life short? You guessed it, by methods directly related to the three reasons above: first, since the vast majority of people lack the emotional and psychological strength to end their lives at 75 by assisted suicide, governments have decided to do it for us by subterfuge and deception under the veil of the plandemic, by either injecting the old and the chronically ill in care homes with Midazolam and Morphine, a fact confirmed by multiple sources across the Western world, abandoning them, denying them critical care, or by deliberately employing lethal treatment protocols and then blame the deaths on Covid, which is why nearly 90% of all so-called Covid deaths are among the elderly. Second, since few would sacrifice their lives to save the planet or our civilization, governments have decided to do it for us through mandatory or quasi-mandatory emergency approved but only experimental vaccines that are designed to kill, all the while pretending to save us from Covid, thus from the flu. Vaccines are used to terminate life, but only a small percentage of vaccines kill (about 1%), the rest are placebos, that way people get to trust the annual or biannual booster shots and the rising death rate can be controlled and blamed on an aging population. The ratio of killer versus harmless shots is dictated by how fast a country wants to reach sustainability and also by the degree to which every country is overpopulated and in overshoot of its resources, which is why only developed nations have high Covid death rates. But who receives a killer versus a harmless shot is entirely left to chance, unless of course you are in the inner circle of the depopulation lobby, a game of Russian roulette that only those who accept being vaccinated (because they are feebleminded, weak or ignoble) are being subjected to, which is why the system wants as many people as possible to be vaccinated. And the lives of those who refuse to be vaccinated are shortened by subjecting them to repeated PCR tests, toxic air from face masks, and constant bombardment with chemicals and neurotoxins to cause brain damage that results in death. Either way, the system is covered by plausible deniability. When Pope Francis and his genocidal cardinals are asking you to get vaccinated as “an act of love” they are actually asking you to put a gun to your head with 99 blanks and one real bullet in it and to pull the trigger hoping you beat the odds. Pope Francis calls this “social and political love”, and it would be indeed if you were told that in so doing you subject yourself to a one in a hundred chance of getting killed so nature and civilization can survive. Third and last, since no one can carry out global genocide, emotionally or physically, people are being manipulated to genocide themselves. There is no henchman or Thanos lurking in the shadows who could murder four billion people, half of mankind, so the architects of the depopulation program have devised a system whereby immoral men and women (politicians) are given positions of power and the authority to impose vaccination and PCR testing on the dumb, weak and indecent from the general population; weak men and women (medical staff) are taught to inject or PCR test to death half of mankind for a wage all the while being told they are heroes; cheap men and women (media people) are paid to repeat the same idiocies ad infinitum written by corrupted men and women (scientists and officials) so the general population can be bamboozled to get vaccinated or PCR tested until enough of them die, all the while being told it is to protect them and those around them; and yes men and women (police and military) are ordered to enforce unconstitutional, immoral and criminal orders to ensure 4 the population obeys. Then the groups complicit are themselves forced to get vaccinated by public health mandate and public pressure exerted from behind the scenes by the grave men (popes, cardinals, generals, industrialists), who know no better and are capable of no better, so there is an even playing field and they too are subjected to the same by-annual Russian roulette gamble and eventually meet the same end as those they cooperate in killing. And so a system is being created whereby the people kill each other, all the while being convinced they are doing the right thing. The only aspect of this program I am still uncertain about because I don’t have access to reliable data is whether the depopulationists intend to kill half of mankind gradually over the next 30 years or suddenly in just two or three years. So far, the evidence suggests they are proceeding gradually, but that is not to say they will not speed up their plan. It could very well be that with every booster the ratio of killer to placebo vaccines will grow from 1 to 100 (which appears to be the current ratio when one considers the number of serious adverse reactions on the VAERS and EudraVigilance databases versus the vaccinated populations of the U.S. and the E.U.) to whatever they can get away with. 5. How and why we must prevent such an abominable outcome? The three measures we would have to adopt knowingly derive directly from the three strategies above: first, instead of being killed by our own governments to prevent economic collapse we must willingly accept to end our own lives at age 75, with no exceptions whatsoever, until the population structure of the developed world stabilizes at a sustainable level, which would take about two generations, thus at most 60 years. In this fashion we will live and die with dignity; we will pose no unbearable burden on our children; we will spend our last days among loved ones and depart from this world from a beautiful place of our own choosing and not with tubes sticking out of every orifice in a sterile hospital bed; we will enable the governing structure to return to the rule of law and true respect for human rights; we will set our affairs in order to prevent squabbles and conflicts among our descendants; we will live healthy lives because we will eat unpoisoned food and drink unpoisoned beverages and use unpoisoned body care products; we will return medicine and public health to the service of mankind from their current status of handmaidens of genocide; and a hundred other equally good reasons. If Pope Francis and his cardinals were truly moral men, they would lead by example, but instead they reserve for themselves the right to live and die of natural causes at a ripe age (most of them are well over 80 years old) while imposing a 75-year lifespan on the rest of us. So far, they have sacrificed just two clerics from the middle ranks, that is how far their love for mankind goes. Second, instead of playing Russian roulette with our lives every six months at vaccine booster time so the global population is halved and thus brought to sustainability, we must reduce the population by adhering to a strict one-child policy in all countries that are in overshoot until they reach sustainable population levels, and to a strict two children policy in all countries that already have sustainable populations. In this fashion we avoid genocide and a dystopian society and reduce the global population to about four billion by the end of this century. I admit that this methodology, though humane, equitable and legal cannot also help improve our 5 species by weeding out the dumb, weak and ignoble, which the current methodology does rather well by creating a level playing field for self-selection according to these three criteria. Improving our species, however, can be done through genetics and epigenetics, as well as through education, meditation, sport, ethics and a just socio-economic system. Mass murder cannot be a foundation for a better society let alone for a more advanced civilization, it can only be a foundation for hell on earth and I assume that no one wants that. Third and last, instead of accepting a society designed to genocide ourselves we make that leap forward in consciousness and education and assume the responsibilities that every planetary civilization must assume if it is not to destroy itself. And we adhere to these planetary responsibilities until every country achieves an optimal population level, thus a population level that its own resources can sustain forever, at a standard of living of its own choosing, without damaging the environment or endangering the survival of future generations. As such, we must create a Planetary Wellbeing Authority and endow it with sole and global enforcement powers to impose a Population Stabilization Law with three components: limited lifespan to 75 years until the population structure is stable, limited fertility to one child only until every country is no longer in overshoot after which two children only until the end of time or until we become an interplanetary species, and optimal population levels determined by the standard of living every country chooses to have. That is how we shepherd ourselves to a better future all the while remaining masters of our faith and captains of our soul. We must and can accomplish this by the end of the century. What is certain is that neither our current leaders nor our current institutional structures can provide us with the leadership we need to survive the transition to sustainability with our humanity intact. All they have given us is a monster’s abyss form which we shall never make it out, let alone evolve from animals to angels. Their idea of love is to see half of us dead in Pfizer’s fields. I say God gave us reason for a reason, to use it…so we can live in His image. Let us use it! Let us live in His image! Let us keep this planet and ourselves as beautiful as He has made us! And let us make our civilization and adornment to His creation
יש לעצור את בדיקות מטוש הפוגעניות הפולשניות.
PCR Tests and the Depopulation Program
Kevin Galalae 10 October 2021
Ever since the plandemic has been started, I asked myself why the authorities insist on performing as many Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests as possible, as often as possible on the same individuals, and on as many people as possible given their invasive nature and the fact that they were never meant for diagnostic but for research purposes and are therefore inaccurate and even misleading. The creator of the PCR test himself, Dr. Kary Mullis, has stated clearly and on many occasions that the results of the PCR tests can be easily misinterpreted to mean anything. Well, now I know how the system is misusing them! The long swab inserted into the nasopharyngeal cavity all the way to the roof of the nose to collect remnants of viral RNA from the nasal mucosa, the tissue that lines the nasal cavity, damages the fascicles of the olfactory nerve, which, as it turns out, has dire consequences for human health and lifespan because the olfactory nerve is one of only two windows in the cranium through which viruses and bacteria can move from nose to brain, thus can cross the blood-brain barrier, the other one being the trigeminal nerve. Let me explain! The olfactory nerve is the only cranial nerve that has stem cells which enable it to continually regenerate throughout life. These stem cells are called olfactory ensheathing cells. They surround the olfactory sensory axons (the appendage of the neuron that transmits impulses away from the cell body) to form the fascicles of the olfactory nerve. In plain English, they are the cells that protect the olfactory nerve and aid its regeneration in case of damage through age or injury. These cells are so unique that doctors have recently begun using them to successfully repair spinal cord injuries and to treat brain diseases. As it turns out, their self-renewing ability make 2 them an ideal relay pathway through which nerve cells can carry out their own repair. They serve, in other words, as conduits through which regenerating axons can pass. The olfactory nerve and bulb neurons both have a life span of four to eight months and are replaced continuously by the neural stem cells that scientists have come to call olfactory ensheathing cells to differentiate them from other stem cells. They promote neuron survival and axon extension. More than this, olfactory ensheathing cells assist in innate immunity because they are phagocytic and, as such, ingest bacteria. They are thus a crucial part of the protection provided to the brain by the immune system. Last but not least, and most extraordinarily, research shows that once the olfactory ensheathing cells lose their ability to regenerate the chance of dying within five years is four times higher in adults 57 to 85 years old. “Olfactory function is thus one of the strongest predictors of 5- year mortality and may serve as a bellwether for slowed cellular regeneration or as a marker of cumulative toxic environmental exposures.” A damaged olfactory nerve is to the brain what a damaged gate is to a citadel, a wide-open entryway for attacks by pathogens. The area of the face that encompasses the nose and the tips of the mouth is at the best of times the most vulnerable part of the body as far as infections are concerned, so much so that it has come to be known as the triangle of death. With the immune defenses down and the gate to the brain wide open, it becomes that much more vulnerable, so much so that popping a pimple, plucking a nose hair or even scratching the inner lining of the nose while nose picking can trigger bacterial infections that affect the brain and can become life-threatening. The PCR tests, therefore, serve two important roles for the depopulation program. In the short-term, by repeatedly damaging the olfactory nerve with nasal swabs the incidence of viral and bacterial infections is rapidly raised and this helps governments create and sustain the impression of a pandemic. Statistics show this positive correlation clearly, for the more people are tested the more people are damaged and left defenseless against various infections that are then mislabeled en masse as Covid infections by simply raising the number of cycles in the thermal cycler until the authorities get the percentage of positive results they want. 3 And in the long-term, by periodically damaging the olfactory nerve it will lose its ability to regenerate and this helps governments prematurely kill countless people ages 57 to 85, the very age groups governments of the developed world want dead to ease the old-age burden and prevent economic collapse. It shouldn’t be forgotten that the current inverted population pyramids of the countries of the developed world cannot be brought to a stable structure, let alone reduced to sustainability, without prematurely killing those making up the wings of the population pyramid to stabilize the population before the old-age burden leads to economic collapse. As it is, every country of the developed world, but especially those in Europe and Japan, have populations that are too old to be economically feasible and too large to be environmentally sustainable. The median age in the EU is 44 years and in Japan it is 48 years. These are countries of old people that will only get older and will inevitable collapse financially. The EU will have a median age of 50 by 2050 and Japan of 53. Who will take care of the old when they make up 60% of the population and who will pay their pensions and medical costs? These are problems humanity has never faced before. 4 5 As for sustainability, the Overshoot Index shows that 114 out of 187 countries have unsustainable populations and that the world itself can sustain only 60% of the current population. Moreover, Earth Overshoot Day, which “marks the date when humanity’s demand for ecological resources and services in a given year exceeds what Earth can regenerate in that year” shows that the ecological footprint of most countries exceed the Earth’s biocapacity long before the end of the year and as such these countries destroy the ability of future generations to live on Earth. Not only is overpopulation a threat to the survival of future generations it is also a threat to the survival of current generations. Nearly eight billion people are vying for the same limited resources and the slice of the pie is getting thinner for every one of us from year to year while mankind ads one billion people to the existing global population every twelve years. 6 Now back to the PCR tests and their role in the international system’s plan to reduce the global population to sustainability before it is too late. Some will argue that if a nasopharyngeal swab test is performed properly, thus at an angle of no more than 30 degrees from the horizontal, it shouldn’t touch the olfactory nerve. However, if performed at an angle within 30 degrees from the horizontal the swab can touch the trigeminal nerve, which would affect the sense of taste and even sight. Moreover, to damage the sense of smell and/or taste the swab need not harm either the olfactory or the trigeminal nerves, it need only irritate the mucosa of the nasopharyngeal cavity, since the two are closely interrelated, which would also affect the entire limbic system. 7 This would explain why so-called Covid patients experience loss of function in the entire gamut of behavioral and emotional responses controlled by the limbic system: sleep, fatigue, cognition, orientation, movement, memory, etc. The mucosa of the nasopharyngeal cavity is damaged irrespective of the angle at which the swab is inserted at so long as it is inserted as deeply and rotated as vigorously as required by the PCR testing procedure, especially when the swabs are designed to do as much damage as possible by having serrated tips capable of scratching and damaging as much epithelium as possible. Having increased people’s vulnerability to infection by irritating the mucosa of the nasopharyngeal cavity or by damaging the olfactory and trigeminal nerves, the planners of the depopulation strategy have also devised means to increase the number of pathogens as well as the amount of chemicals and neurotoxins that reach the brain. 8 By mandating mask wearing indoors and outdoors, knowing that exhaled air contains numerous bacteria and viruses, the planners are subjecting billions of people to inhale pathogens that the body exhaled from the respiratory tract, which is always colonized with disease organisms, into the nasopharyngeal cavity and from there straight into the brain via the damaged olfactory or trigeminal nerve entry points. Hundreds of studies show that the inside of surgical masks contain greatly increased loads of bacteria and fungi after prolonged wearing and are a source of contamination not only for those wearing them but also for those around them. The latest and most comprehensive study has found that mask wearing by the general population leads to: “…changes in respiratory physiology of mask wearers with significant correlation of O2 drop and fatigue (p < 0.05), a clustered co-occurrence of respiratory impairment and O2 drop (67%), N95 mask and CO2 rise (82%), N95 mask and O2 drop (72%), N95 mask and headache (60%), respiratory impairment and temperature rise (88%), but also temperature rise and moisture (100%) under the masks. Extended mask-wearing by the general population could lead to relevant effects and consequences in many medical fields.” Moreover, study after study has found that face masks “are not able to completely block the transmission of virus droplets/aerosols even when completely sealed” and are therefore ineffective in preventing the spread of infections. The system is well too familiar with both these facts and it is mandating mask wearing at all times to intentionally cause respiratory problems it can then falsely attribute to a virus. And this explains the respiratory problems attributed to Covid. Having damaged the immune defenses of the brain and leaving it exposed to pathogens by harming the epithelium of the nasopharyngeal cavity, and then subjecting the brain to asphyxiation by depriving it of oxygen (O2) and bombarding it with carbon dioxide (CO2) the respiratory center of the brain, which controls minute-tominute breathing, and that is in the medulla oblongata, begins to malfunction. As a result, people have trouble breathing. The breathlessness (dyspnoea) associated with Covid is therefore not due to lung lesions but to damage to neural processing, thus due to brain damage. To increase the incidence of brain damage, whose symptoms can then be conveniently attributed to a relatively harmless virus of the corona family, the system is employing a third strategy, namely subjecting the adult population to two neurotoxins. The most likely culprits are isodecanes and mycotoxins because the former can be easily hidden in body care products while the latter in foods and drinks (especially beer) that contain mold, but more importantly 9 because both can lead to loss of smell (anosmia) and taste (ageusia). The role of isodecanes in chemosensory dysfunction is well documented as is the role of mycotoxins. Since women use far more cosmetics than men, they would be primarily poisoned with isodecanes, while men would be primarily poisoned with mycotoxins as they can be easily hidden in beer and men consume far more beer than women. These delivery methods would also spare children and teenagers since they use neither cosmetics nor drink beer. Furthermore, children and teenagers are not primed for brain damage by being subjected to PCR tests that damage the mucosa of their nasopharyngeal cavity and leaves their brains undefended. While in 2020 children and teenagers were spared the trauma and damage of PCR tests, they remained healthy and rarely if ever displayed symptoms attributed to Covid. As soon as children and teenagers began to be subjected to PCR tests in 2021, they too began to show the symptoms attributed to Covid, but that in fact are the result of deliberately caused brain damage. I have added this third method of sickening the population via neurotoxins alongside the damage caused by the swabs used for PCR tests and the chronic respiratory damage caused by prolonged mask wearing because people who have never subjected themselves to either PCR tests or constant mask wearing have also fallen ill and have exhibited the same typical symptoms attributed to Covid, including loss of smell and taste. I am one such person and I was poisoned and sickened with neurotoxins through a physical attack on me by, I assume, an agent of the state who sprayed an unknown mix of neurotoxins in my face and then ran away from the scene of the crime. Within hours of this attack on me, which happened in October of 2020, I fell ill and required three months to fully recover, though I never stopped working and never sought medical help from anyone least of all national medical authorities. Had this incident not occurred, I would have been unable to ascertain, let alone confirm, that direct neurotoxic poisoning could be one of the methods used by governments to sicken people they target for specific purposes, in my case the authorities had hoped that by falling ill I would publicly acknowledge and therefore confirm the existence and 10 danger of Covid. Unfortunately for the authorities I did not do that. I gave my body the time it needed to heal and six months later I published a post that detailed the entire incident. Shortly after, I was shut out of my Facebook, Academia and Medium accounts. But the system has not limited itself to just neurotoxins to increase the incidence of illness. It is also using chemicals. Medical staff have experienced a much higher incidence of illness attributed to Covid not because as frontline workers they come into contact with Covid more often than the general population, but because the Battelle Memorial Institute, which is where the plandemic is being coordinated from, has used hydrogen peroxide and a proprietary system that was emergency authorized on 29 March 2020 to sterilize face masks so they can be reused in hospitals and clinics throughout the medical system. This method of causing respiratory problems in medical personnel was so effective that not even the FDA could stomach the damage and first issued a warning to Battelle, on 7 October 2020, and eventually revoked its authorization on 30 April 2021, by which the time the damage had been done and the system no longer needed poisoned masks to sicken frontline workers because Covid vaccines came into effect and the plandemic has been driven by vaccine injuries ever since. 11 Another chemical used by the system to cause maximum damage to the brain so as to sustain the illusion of a pandemic is ethylene oxide, a well-known cancer-causing substance, which is used to sterilize the PCR test swabs themselves. And since the swabs smear this mutagenic chemical on the mucosa of the nose, which is hypersensitive, it damages our health in unknown ways. Finally, the general population has been subjected to an onslaught of dangerous chemicals through hand sanitizers, whose use medical authorities have mandated for the most mundane activities ever since the plandemic has been started. Methanol is probably the most dangerous and most often found chemical in hand sanitizers. The FDA has a list of 75 hand sanitizers that contain methanol and warns the public to stay away from them. It is also known to cause metabolic acidosis, visual disturbances and neurological deficit. To sum it all up, the coronavirus blamed for countless deaths real and imagined is a political fiction. The symptoms attributed to Covid are caused by a deliberate three-pronged attack on our health and lives by our own national and international authorities who: - first, damage the epithelium of the nasopharyngeal cavity with PCR test swabs to bring down the immune defenses that protect our brain leaving our control center exposed to viruses, bacteria, chemicals and neurotoxins that can now get passed the blood-brain barrier - second, create a closed loop between the mouth and the nose, thus between outgoing and incoming air, by forcing us to wear face masks throughout the day, in order to subject our exposed brains to constant assault with viruses, bacteria and fungi the body is trying to get rid of and to chronically asphyxiate our brains - third, increase damage to the brain by subjecting us to chemicals and neurotoxins that have no place in our environment and that could never reach the brain had they not destroyed the blood-brain barrier This explains, among other things: Why the common flu has disappeared from the statistics in 2020 and health authorities attribute to Covid the pathologies of nearly every infection on the planet. Why children and teenagers have not fallen ill with Covid until they too became subject to nasal swab tests. Why as soon as PCR testing goes up the incidence of illness goes up too. Why patients with no lung damage whatsoever experience breathing problems. Why the pathology attributed to Covid is so wide-ranging and so far removed from any other viral infection of the respiratory tract Why the pandemic disappears and reappears when a government decides that its pandemic prevention measures do not affect the summer and winter holiday season, especially in countries that live off tourism. Why so-called Covid patients take up to six months to be free of symptoms, which is not the kind of damage viruses are capable of, but that can be explained by brain damage, which takes a long time to heal. 12 Why in temperate countries the virus disappears in the summer while in hot countries where it is always summer it never disappears. Why vaccine passports are only given to people who are either vaccinated or have had positive PCR tests, but never to those who show that they have naturally acquired antibodies since their end goal is to kill as many of us as possible. Why there is no pharmacological treatment for Covid, since there is no Covid, and repeated trauma to parts of the body that are crucial to the body’s immune defenses and to brain health cannot be healed with drugs. Why at the beginning of the plandemic the hospitals were empty and medical staff were sent home or trained to do choreographed dances, but shortly after PCR testing began the hospitals filled. And why governments continue to insist on subjecting as many people as possible as often as possible to an intrusive medical test that can be easily done by analyzing saliva. To solve the demographic and environmental problems we face, governments have decided, and the Vatican has approved, that henceforth no one shall die of natural causes and that the only choice the people have is whether to die by vaccine or by PCR test.
תגובות