Talking Depop:
A Conversation that Can Change the World
https://www.facebook.com/groups/273545243825420/permalink/483397689506840
Dr. Thomas C. Carmine, holistic general practitioner, independent thinker and scientist
exchanges ideas with Kevin M. Galalae, human rights activist, author, historian, journalist,
and expert on covert geopolitical programs and policies with respect to globalization,
decarbonization and depopulation. Kevin M. Galalae adamantly opposes the adoption of
chemical impairment of human fertility and health with Fluorides, Biphenyls, sterilizing
vaccines and other hormone disruptors. Already in 2016, Kevin M. Galalae published a peer
reviewed paper elucidating the role of pandemics and vaccines in future UN programs of
population control. Since 2010 he sacrificed a good part of his freedom and wellbeing to
expose immoral and divisive policies enacted by the United Nations and the greater
international community in the name of peace and security.
Topics:
1. Discovery of the Global Depopulation
Program (GDPP) – Personal motives and experiences (p. 1)
2. Depopulation vs. decarbonization - overcoming deception – education – empowerment (p.11)
3. Protagonists of the GDPP – Vatican - UN - WHO – military - governments – corporations (p.15)
4. The role of pandemics and vaccines as controllable instruments in modern depopulation (p.19)
5. Geopolitical vision, social and ethical implications (p.21)
6. Manufactured health – crisis, psychological and biological effects – collective burn-out (p.26)
7. Alternatives to depop – socio-economic changes (p.30)
8. Overshoot Index, planetary boundaries, climate change and apocalypse desires (p.33)
9. The role of Russia – GDPP / Decarb – Democratic fiber - Cold War (p.36)
10. Assisted suicide (p.39)
11. The role of China (p.46)
12. The system’s next steps (p.49)
1.
Discovery of the Global Depopulation Program – Personal motives and experiences
Kevin, since 2010 you are criticizing and publicly exposing the globally coordinated systemic
use of covert population control measures to keep growing world population numbers at bay.
Do you remember the first document you came across which convinced you of the existence of
a global depopulation program (GDPP) which still seems to be quite unbelievable to most
people?
No such document exists. I came to the realization through painstaking research of the
demographic, statistical, medical and political data and the historical record. The trigger,
however, was the refusal of all nations to publish my findings on the program of Surveillance
and Censorship I had discovered in the UK in 2009. I asked myself why the so-called enemies
of democracy refused to publish clear evidence of violation of democratic rights and liberties
by western nations that constantly criticize them for the very same crimes. The refusal of
Cuba, Iran, Russia, Venezuela and all other presumable enemies of democracy to publish my
findings could only mean one thing, namely that they are all hiding something that is of
common interest. And once I began asking the right questions I discovered clear evidence of
population control almost everywhere. One must just learn to read between the lines and to
properly interpret the data. 2
The revelation, however, came in 2012 as I was writing a series of articles for a Norwegian
newspaper on the causes for the destruction of human rights. By the third article, entitled The
Effects of Overpopulation on Human Rights, everything came together. The said Norwegian
newspaper refused to publish it without providing any explanation. Instead, its editor sent me
an email with just one sentence before ceasing any and all communications: “May God help
you now”. My article has been printed two years later by Intellihub and can still be read on
its website.
The second trigger was the damage done to the reproductive system and to human health in
general by water, salt and milk fluoridation and the refusal of governments to abandon
fluoridation despite the clear medical evidence and intense opposition by civil society. This
paradox is always the clearest evidence of a population control method, as we see it repeated
again and again with glyphosate, artemisinin, vaccines and dozens of other weapons of mass
depopulation. Governments and politicians always take the road of least public resistance
except when it comes to methods of depopulation, which they defend at any and all political
cost.
At which institutions were you studying when you discovered the Program of Surveillance and
Censorship in 2009 and what were your subjects of study? Can you share more information
on this program? Which of your discoveries made you suspicious and why did you blow it?
I first studied political philosophy in 2009 at Oxford University, as a two-month summer
course, and subsequently began a two-year Master’s program in International Relations and
Global Order at Leicester University. Six weeks into the Oxford course it became clear that
the academic discourse is censored by people who participate in the course as students but
whose role is to surveille academia on behalf of governments and to censor the very rights
that are supposed to be protected by universities, namely freedom of thought, expression and
conscience. The program and those in charge are exposed in my article The Great Secret:
Surveillance and Censorship in Britain and the EU.
I also challenged it through the British adjudication process all the way to the highest
authority in the country, the Office of the Independent Adjudicator, which concluded in a
whitewash. A synopsis of the case, however, can be found here under the name Covert
Censorship at Oxford and Leicester University: CONTEST and State-Sponsored
Discrimination.
And finally, I took my case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The program
was shut down in the UK and I prevented its introduction throughout the EU, but the ECHR
refused to take the case for its obvious geopolitical implications. My Application to the
ECHR, however, can still be read and scrutinized online.
Last but not least, I went to Strasbourg, France, where the ECHR is located to express my
dismay and dissatisfaction with the existence of such a blatantly illegal and immoral program
with a hunger strike which lasted 30 days, time during which I bombarded the authorities with
letters, appeals and evidence, such as this letter to Mr. Thomas Hammarberg, the Council of
Europe Commissioner for Human Rights at that time.
I blew the program because it was a gross violation of our fundamental rights to freedom of
speech, thought and conscience and posed a real and present danger to democracy, the rule of
law, and plain old human decency. 3
Upon my return to Canada from Strasbourg, the system launched a vicious attack on me and
over the next two years proceeded to systematically destroy my life, career and reputation by
misusing the judicial system and the institutions of state. I have been at war with the system
ever since and have won every battle.
It is important to note that the conflict at Oxford arose because I defended the position that
human nature is fundamentally good while the course tutor and the system’s agent promoted
the notion that man is fundamentally evil. It is this view of human nature that underpins the
Global Depopulation Program. Until those who govern us abandon the notion that man is
fundamentally evil, and stop treating mankind as such, nothing will change. We will instead
sink deeper into a global totalitarian state that is being sold to us as a New World Order, but is
in fact nothing more than the nightmarish reflection of the dark souls of those who govern us.
The full documentation of my battle for freedom in education is held by Wikispooks.
The Global Depopulation Program (GDPP) you discovered and exposed to the public is quite
hard to digest and it must have impacted you in a strong way bringing you to extremes like
hunger strikes and whatever led to your 9 arrests so far.
When I first came to the knowledge that governments use covert methods of depopulation I
questioned my analysis because I thought it can’t be right, but once I confirmed its validity I
was shocked and then angered. It took me a while to get over the anger. Irrespective of what I
felt, I immediately moved into action and have dedicated my life ever since to making this
forbidden knowledge universally known, whatever the cost to me, because I understood from
the very beginning that this knowledge, once freed, will radically change the world for the
better.
This knowledge is extraordinarily empowering and useful because it allows me to understand
the system’s motives and moves and to predict its future actions, but most of all because it
gives me the insights necessary to provide better alternatives. Despite the system’s best efforts
to confuse and confound, it is perfectly clear to me what it is doing and why. I can read it like
an open book, and this enables me to frame every political decision – that to others may seem
incomprehensible – in the proper light and to criticize it constructively, which is why my
work is closely scrutinized by every national government and international organization on
earth and why I often see my ideas and advice implemented.
The sacrifices I have made of my own volition to free and protect the truth and the relentless
retaliatory actions I have suffered at the hands of the system are tiny compared with the
wisdom, influence and respect I have gained.
When you and the GDPP met for the first time there was significant mutual irritation leading
to consequent and persistent protest from your side and strong sanctions against you by the
system you were threatening. Apart from your anger and rightful indignation did you also
perceive the necessity of population control already in the early stages of your activism or did
you come to this point only later as you dived deeper into this complex material?
The logic and the need for population control were self-evident to me from the very
beginning. In fact, long before I realized there is a population control program I limited
myself to two children only because it has been clear to me since the early 1990s that the 4
planet is grossly overpopulated and that unless we all do our part our children will suffer the
consequences. But you need not take my word for it since I wrote so in my first book on the
subject of population control Chemical and Biological Depopulation (first published in 2012
under the title Water, Salt, Milk: Killing Our Unborn Children):
“This is the picture that emerges. The bipolar system of the post-war period –
composed of the Soviet Union and the communist camp on the one hand and the
United States and the capitalist camp on the other – has preserved the peace not
primarily through nuclear deterrence as it is believed, but through their collusion in
the depopulation agenda. While nuclear deterrence was merely the passive and overt
policy of global peace, depopulation through fluoridation was the active and covert
policy. Nuclear deterrence and depopulation are two sides of the same coin and one
cannot exist without the other. Nuclear deterrence makes war impossible as it would
lead to mutually assured destruction and therefore deprives societies of the
traditional way of thinning their numbers, violent conflict. If the excess population
cannot be discarded of by periodically sending men into war as cannon fodder,
which then leaves a large proportion of the females unmarried and childless,
therefore depressing population growth for two or three generations, a substitute has
to be found that can take enough lives to compare with war.
Fluoridation accomplishes the same as war but without material destruction and
with infinitely less overt human suffering. It is therefore, in the minds of our leaders,
an elegant solution to an age-old problem, overpopulation, now exacerbated by
extraordinary advances in medicine, nutrition and living conditions that have led not
only to a population explosion but also to much longer lives.
While this is good for the individual it is a conundrum for societies, which now have
to contend with feeding and clothing and sheltering a greater number of people than
ever before at a greater pace than ever before and who must do so without the safety
valve of war, which allows those in power to sacrifice the few to save the many once
the population has outgrown the available resources.
The importance of fluoridation cannot be overstated, but it cannot exist as a
depopulation policy without the other side of the coin, a credible threat from a
credible nuclear-armed enemy that makes total mutual annihilation inevitable.
Without such a threat, the political leadership can no longer justify the secret war it
wages on its own people in order to prevent the greater evil of mutually assured
destruction through nuclear weapons.
When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, it was necessary for world peace that the
Soviet and American leadership (of Michael Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan) find a
new instrument – since nuclear deterrence had been invalidated by the cessation of
the Cold War – that would reaffirm their commitment to the depopulation agenda.
The Earth Charter came to be that instrument and the secret depopulation agenda is
hidden this time behind a new byword, sustainable development. The lethal threat
now used by our governments to justify the war on us is environmental catastrophe
and that threat comes from us and is a much greater threat than its antecedent,
resource scarcity. As long as we procreate, and our numbers grow, our governments
will have no choice but to wage war on us.5
Anticipating the collapse of the Soviet Union, of which the West was warned in
advance by the Soviet leadership, the United Nations World Commission on
Environment and Development called in 1987 for a new charter to guide the
transition to a new world order and to preserve peace through a new ethos called
sustainable development, of which population control is the most vital component. In
1992, immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, then Secretary General of
the UN, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, urged the international community to adopt a new
charter at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit and the process was jumpstarted in 1994
by Mikhail Gorbachev, Maurice Strong (Chairman of the Earth Summit) and the
government of the Netherlands, which is a steadfast supporter of the depopulation
agenda and its most generous patron. The lethal threat to humankind that
environmental catastrophe represents, has replaced the threat of mutual annihilation
by nuclear weapons as the justification for not only continuing but expanding the
ambit of the depopulation policy, which is why genetically modified organisms were
added to the existing arsenal of fluoridation methods as the newest eugenic weapon
of mass destruction (pp.134-5)
Can you remember any key event or revelation which fundamentally changed your view to the
world and subsequently your social identity?
My view of the world changed the moment I realized that the rule of law, democracy, and our
fundamental rights and liberties are mere fictions that cease to exist altogether as soon as the
Global Depopulation Program is in any way threatened. All earthly power rests on this
knowledge and all those who wield power do so only because they have monopolized this
knowledge.
My social identity changed the moment I realized that governments have broken the social
contract. At that point I broke free of all authority since all authority is illegitimate in the
absence of a valid social contract. That placed me above and beyond the law, just as those
who are in control of the depopulation program are above and beyond the law. Ever since, I
have been outside the matrix of global control and invulnerable to any and all earthly
authorities.
You say you are above and beyond the law, just as those who are in control of the GDPP - do
you mean you have reached a state of juridical immunity? That would contradict your 9
arrests so far.
All my arrests led to pre-trial detention and resulted in my release prior to court date because
the system will never allow any aspect of the Global Depopulation Program to come out in a
court of law. Furthermore, all but the last arrest in Switzerland happened before 2014 when
the system was still trying to intimidate me into silence by repeatedly arresting me under false
and fabricated charges. As for my last arrest in Switzerland in 2016, which occurred when I
attempted to do a citizen’s arrest on Dr. Margaret Chan, then Director-General of the World
Health Organization, I was held just for one night and only to be thrown out of the country the
next day. The charges were subsequently dropped.
If I or anyone else were to execute a head of state or government for participating in the
Global Depopulation Program and therefore committing crimes against humanity the system
could never bring me or anyone else for that matter to court because the program of 6
depopulation would be exposed, and the evidence would become part of the public record.
Furthermore, I would win because I would invoke self-defense and easily prove it. The
secrecy that protects the program of depopulation is also its Achilles heel. What the system
does under those circumstances is to kill that person under the pretext of resisting arrest or
attempting to flee and then manufacture a fictitious motive for the crime; one that makes no
mention of population control, which I am sure has happened to many insiders who attempted
to blow the whistle and whose silence could not be bought.
I should note that I would not have hesitated for even one second to execute one of the key
members of the Global Depopulation Program if I had thought this would result in the
termination of the program. Unfortunately, the world’s biggest and most important program
cannot be terminated this way nor should it be terminated before a better one is put in its
place; one that is open, legal, moral, ethical and humane. And that can only be done through
peaceful means.
You went to Geneva some years ago to expose the politics of the World Health Organization
(WHO). You even intended to arrest Director-General Mr. Margaret Chan Fung Fu-chun.
What did you think was the major crime of Mr. Chan and what were your experiences in
Geneva?
I went to Geneva in July 2016 to stop the system from using medicine and public health as
fronts for population control. Dr. Chan turned the World Health Organization (WHO) into a
bioterrorist organization and perverted medicine and public health to serve as handmaidens of
genocide. No one abused the newly created instrument of global bioterrorism, the Public
Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), more often and more brutally than her,
thus enabling governments to use various plandemics as opportunities for mass sterilization
and the wholesale destruction of the immune system with vaccines and drugs. My attempt to
arrest her was of course symbolic and intended to give the system notice that I knew what
they were up to and will also tell the world.
My confrontation with the WHO revealed just how rotten and perverse this organization and
the people who work for it are. Although my behavior was calm and peaceful at all times, the
WHO called the police on me and provided a completely fabricated statement of facts. Its
officials declared that I was violent and caused a commotion when in fact I was as civilized
and peaceful as Mahatma Gandhi and was simply waiting to see Dr. Chan on a chair in the
entrance lobby where the security guards have directed me to sit and wait. I describe the
whole incident in my filing to the Swiss courts.
So, already in 2016 you were well aware of intentional use of pandemics and vaccines for
global depopulation. Did your activism provoke any resonance in these days?
Had civil society supported me we would not be neck deep in the era of decarbonization by
plandemic and depopulation by vaccination. The covid-19 plandemic, which is a political
fiction, would have never happened. No one can say I didn’t warn the world about it. After
all, I put it all on paper and published it in a peer reviewed medical journal in March 2016
under the title Turning Nature Against Man: The Role of Pandemic, Vaccines and Genetics in
the UN’s Plan to Halt Population Growth. 7
That I did not receive the help I deserve is, however, due to the fact that there is no civil
society. The existing civil society has long been subsumed into the system and acts merely as
a last line of defense for the system. It exists only to misdirect the people’s efforts and to
exhaust their energy and resources by turning them around in circles without accomplishing
anything. By my estimates more than 95% of all civil society organizations are controlled by
the system and are even led by agents of the system. Civil society, in other words, is in the
same sorry state as the media and must be recreated from the ground up. As I have stated
before, the Global Depopulation Program has perverted everything. To preserve the integrity
of my organization, The Center of Global Consciousness, I have had to limit membership and
maintain full and sole control of its leadership. The system spared no effort or expense to
infiltrate my organization and take control of its leadership. That is how the wealth we
produce is wasted, how our progress is prevented, and how our society becomes increasingly
corrupt from the top down.
In recent times the system seems to tolerate more of you and your criticism - it actually funds
part of your work because you are raising public consciousness for population issues. Would
you agree that the system itself wants to ease the burden of this secret mis-relationship
between populace and governments - would they like to achieve more transparency but do
this in a self-protective manner? Your work might even pave the way for a violent-free
transition in their own intent?
It appears so, although it may well be that the system has no choice; the cat is out of the bag
and no one is going to put it back in, certainly not in the digital era. And since I am the only
accurate and fair analyst and interpreter of the system’s moves, methods and intentions they
have decided to let me speak while at the same time limit my reach so that very few hear what
I have to say.
As for funding, the picture is a lot more complicated. There is evidence that the funding for
my two hunger strikes at the Vatican (in 2014 and 2016) come mostly from the system
because my goals aligned with theirs, after all the Church’s doctrine on birth control stands in
the way of an open population control program and therefore ties the hands of secular
authorities. On the other hand, every time I attacked the system’s core secular institutions,
such as the World Health Organization in Geneva (in 2016), NATO and the Council of
Europe in Brussels (in 2017), the system didn’t contribute a dime to my political actions,
which were funded by donations from individual supporters, many of them people of faith.
More than this, my first hunger strike at the Vatican was funded in part at least by the
Canadian government in order to get rid of me so it wouldn’t have to pay me compensation
for violating all my fundamental rights and liberties. It should be noted that the Canadian
government shut down my civil lawsuit because it “is not in the interest of national security”
and has denied me access to information requests because my file falls under the category of
“preventing or suppressing subversive or hostile activities”, as this Canadian Security
Intelligence Service response clearly indicates.
As for the money I received in-between my many political actions in various capitals, it was
most likely intended to ensure that I don’t starve to death and may well be an obligation
imposed on the system by the international courts I appealed to for protection in 2012. I say
this because the sums donated are very modest and did not even cover my monthly bills,
which were born mostly by my family members in Germany and subsequently in Romania. 8
Another type of financial support I received, and which lasted only a couple of years,
appeared to come from food corporations and may well have been motivated by their hope
that I would succeed in compelling governments to stop forcing food corporations to lace
their products with depopulation poisons / endocrine disruptors.
The last type of financial support I received may well have come from Big Oil and Russia, the
reason being that so long as I show the public that the depopulation and decarbonization
programs are tied at the hip the people would refuse to cooperate and in so doing the
decarbonization process would be delayed, which is what the nations and corporations
dependent on fossil fuels want.
If the system were genuinely interested in my success raising awareness of population issues
all it would need to do is pay me fair compensation for the harm it has caused me and my
family for the past 12 years. To date the system owes me at least 20 million Euros in
damages. That this has not happened demonstrates that the system’s funding is motivated
primarily by the objectives I mentioned above and not by my role in raising awareness and in
facilitating a violent-free transition from covert to overt methods of population control.
You would say that the food corporations do all but endorse adulterating their products with
endocrine disruptors, but are forced by international rules convened upon above national and
international law? Do you remember some of those food corporations presumably supporting
your work, once you mentioned Nestle among those?
I suspect the funding came from Nestle because it was sent by a Nestle executive. He may
well have acted on his own, but I rather doubt it given the amount, 500 Euros a month, and
the duration, circa two years. It is rather obvious that no self-respecting individual let alone
company would willingly lace its food products with endocrine disruptors designed to aid the
depopulation program. But if these companies refuse to comply they will be simply denied
capital and access to markets and thus bankrupted within a year or two.
It is the political class not the economic class that drives the depopulation program and even
the political class is merely the executor of the spiritual class and therefore just a proxy of the
Vatican as far as population control is concerned.
Which state department in Switzerland could carry the burden of population control as
required for member states by the UN. Do you have a clue whether these taskforces operate
publicly or covert?
It's the Ministry of Health (BAG) and the executive (Bundesrat).
That would mean an official ministry hiding away very crucial information to the public. Do
they hold any secret agreement with the UN mandating the way and the extent of population
control measures? Could the citizens obtain knowledge of at least parts of these supposed
agreements and are there any laws protecting government’s secrecy?
They operate in the open and hide everything in plain sight. There is no need for secrecy
because their scientific data with respect to fertility is hidden in plain sight. For instance, as
they communicate the level of fluoride in the urine they also communicate whether the right 9
level has been reached for infertility and sub-fertility since they alone are aware of that
threshold. But the data is presented as a gauge for fluoride's effectiveness on preventing tooth
decay not fertility. Only those in the know will understand the data's dual meaning. And the
same goes for vaccines now with respect to their devastating effect on immunity. As they
communicate to the general public that the covid-19 vaccines are 95% effective in preventing
infection, they also communicate to their rank and file that the vaccines destroy immunity in
95% of recipients. This mirrors the duplicitous nature of all government communications in
the era of transparency in that all communications mean one thing for the general public, who
will receive only the direct meaning, and another to system insiders, for whom it will also
have a second meaning, oftentimes the absolute opposite of that meant for the general public.
I am certain that documents of the secret agreements between governments and the UN exist
and are held in secret archives at the UN and of those governments who are UN Member
States. Furthermore, the Vatican Secret Archives certainly contain papal bulls ordering the
start of a war or the spread of a plague to reduce the population at times when resources were
exceeded and famine loomed large. That is why to this day no one but the Pope has full
access to the Vatican Secret Archives, which contain 85 kilometers of shelving with millions
of documents spanning 12 centuries. I was denied access to them twice.
Heterodox thinkers or dissidents who supposedly challenge the power structure and the main
narrative are usually either criminalized or dismissed as psychiatrically ill by the system they
are criticizing. After reading your account about how the system, including your wife reacted
to your attempts to throw light on unbearable social evil, you obviously experienced both -you
were criminalized and declared delusional. The latter is usually applied, when public court
hearings are to be avoided. It was a well-established practice in former communist countries
but was applied in recent months to a lot of Corona-critical intellectuals. Generally speaking,
the more unfounded, totalitarian and rigid the intellectual and ethical basis of the political
system, the bigger the fear of opposition and the harsher the discrimination and negative
sanction of dissidents. Personally, did you rather sense criminalization or being shrugged off
as deluded?
The system tried everything to silence and destroy me, and continues to try, but it has failed
and will continue to fail. And if it keeps fighting me it will lose the little credibility it has left.
If history shows us anything is that people are much stronger than any system and that it takes
only one strong and determined individual to destroy an entire system. Man prevails over all
systems because man creates systems, and as he can create them so he can also destroy them.
The system first tried to declare me “delusional”, as that would have invalidated all my
assertions, but failed. Then it tried to destroy and stop me financially and failed because
poverty has not prevented me from continuing my work. Next it tried to destroy and stop me
legally and failed, because I became my own lawyer and won every legal proceeding easily.
And to this day it tries to destroy me emotionally and it has failed.
To this day, the system holds my children hostage and prevents me from seeing or even
communicating with them, directly or indirectly. It has been ten years since I last heard from
my children and I don’t even know if they are still alive let alone how they are. This, better
than anything, demonstrates the perverse nature of the people who sit at the top of the world
as well as their pettiness and vindictiveness. It also shows that such people cannot be
entrusted with anything let alone absolute power. Those who sit at the highest level of global
governance must have the highest standards of governance not the lowest. 10
I have won and will continue to win because I hold myself to higher standards than those who
govern us. Despite their best efforts I am still standing and while my voice gains more
credibility by the day they have lost all credibility. Of course, I have a position of great
advantage because I am supported by the truth while they are in a position of great
disadvantage for they are hiding behind lies. Therefore, it has always been a certainty that I
will win, and the system will lose.
Who were the people supporting you and what were your spiritual foundations enabling your
idealistic pursuit amidst significant resistance of the system you were exposing and a
predominantly blinded and numbed environment?
My best friends in Canada stood by me first during the initial attacks by the system, Ishin and
Nursen Kaya and Manuel and Robin Tomaz. They literally saved my life. Then my family
once I fled Canada: my twin sister and her husband in the US, Irina and Traian Ardelian; my
younger brother, Daniel Galalae, and mother, Georgeta Galalae, in Germany; and my aunt
and uncle, Constantin and Carolina Parvu, here in Romania.
Total strangers from around the world have supported me with donations and encouragement
throughout this time. Some come from politics and diplomacy while others from religion and
business. Some are individuals acting on their own conscience while others are members of
organized structures whose names were never disclosed to me. Some want me to fail while
others pin all their hopes on me. Most help was intended to sway me one way or another, but
some was pure in intent. I have benefitted from the financial support of about one thousand
individuals and from the moral support of at least ten thousand people from around the world.
My strength comes from my belief that man is fundamentally good even though there is good
and evil in all of us. What aspect of our nature is actualized depends on endowment and
environment, on decisions and conditions. So long as I contribute to the creation and
sustenance of a decent environment I am a force of good. My strength comes also from my
family and upbringing. I have the good fortune of having the best parents in the world and to
have benefitted from unconditional love from the moment I was born and to this very day.
My strength comes also – and perhaps primarily – from my love for my children, whom the
system made the mistake of separating me from for the past ten years, and for whom I will
move mountains.
My strength comes from my love for the truth and the knowledge that truth is God and that so
long as I am the torchbearer of truth, I have divine protection.
My strength comes from the love I have for this extraordinarily beautiful planet we live on
and that is our one and only home.
Last but not least, my strength comes from God himself, who put his lovelight into my very
being in the Palau Islands on a moonless yet star-filled night and ordered me to save the
world, an event I describe in my book “Killing Us Softly”, pages 117 to 120:
Did members of your family - you grew up in communist Romania - already experience
repression for ideological friction with the prevalent narrative?11
I come from a long tradition of opponents to tyranny and injustice. My father, Dr. Costel
Galalae, antagonized the communists and spent five years in prison as a political prisoner. My
grandfather, Anghel Galalae, antagonized the Stalinists and spent years on the run under a
false identity as well as losing his entire wealth. And there are similar stories going back to
pre-communist days. We just don’t like injustice and lies, corruption and hypocrisy,
ignorance and cruelty…and say so publicly and loudly. My epic struggles against the
depopulationists are in the same tradition. I suppose it’s in my pedigree, in my blood. We
helped burry monarchism and communism and I will ensure that genocidal capitalism and
Christian eugenicism are buried to.
You described the modern Global Depopulation Program (GDPP) to be rooted in the terrors
of WW2 whose repetition should be avoided at almost all cost by the victorious powers. So,
the GDPP can be seen as a martial philanthropic apocalypse-avoidance-program. Initially -
as to my understanding - there wasn’t a lot of environmental concern. The people in charge
back in 1946 yet established the GDPP on certain implicit convictions:
a) Too many people put too much pressure on resources leading to scarcity of
resources provoking violent conflict. From there GDPP was seen as a liability to ease
resource-pressure preventing war and collapse.
b) Population control cannot be facilitated in an open manner, because the masses
will reject it. Hence a degree of deception and pseudo democracy was considered inevitable.
c) The people are neither willing nor capable of assuming responsibility; an allknowing elite has to do this burdensome job.
d) This elite controlling the limitations of life - birth and death - is principally superior
to humankind, they cannot be held accountable and are above financial restriction, morality,
religion and law.
When you became aware of the existence the GDPP did you consciously question these
premises and what raised your anger the most?
I questioned all these premises to see if they hold water and found them to be solid. But they
are solid only so long as the people remain unaware of the true nature of power and that is the
case because the elites refuse to educate the masses and continue to monopolize this allimportant knowledge. In other words, the people were never given a chance to emancipate to
a higher level of being and thus live in the image of God by showing the same selfless
discipline in society as God does in Nature to keep all species in equilibrium.
What angers me is the refusal of the elites to make this knowledge universal, so we can climb
to a higher level of civilization. Instead they are stalling us at this neo-medieval stage and are
doing this not because they believe the masses incapable of rising to a higher level but for
self-serving reasons, so they alone can continue to benefit from this arrangement which has
them in complete control of society for their absolute benefit. They know that once this
knowledge becomes part of the public domain they are no longer needed and their hold on
power will no longer be possible or justified.
2. Depopulation vs. Decarbonization - overcoming deception – education - empowerment
You appear to share the elites’ view of the overpopulation/carbonization inevitably leading to
war and/or irreversible apocalyptic climate collapse if not mended in short time. Would you 12
also generally approve the reinforced effort to save us with more restrictive politics in the
shadow of the plandemic?
It is not only the climate we endanger but all nine planetary boundaries and unless we act now
it will be too little too late. It is however not more restrictive politics I advocate for but the
people’s empowerment so that we all know what we have to do and why. Firm, clear and fair
legislation is needed only to ensure that we all do our part and that no one dodges his
responsibilities. I am however certain that once the current leadership provides full disclosure
everyone will understand just how dire our situation is and how difficult it will be to avoid
catastrophe. I am also certain that at that point everyone will understand the need for a
Planetary Wellbeing Authority with the power to enforce the same rules worldwide; an
authority that stands above politics because it has to deal with existential problems that are
not subject to compromise.
Would you say that broad parts of the public are neither capable nor willing to accept the
dramatic degree of transgression of global sustainability boundaries by human mankind and
therefore have to be forced into salvation of as many as possible by sacrificing a good share
of us?
It is clear that about half of mankind is not equipped with the intelligence required to
comprehend the complexity of our civilization’s predicament. It is equally clear that more
than three-quarters of mankind lack the psychological strength required to face the facts of
their own volition. But it is also absolutely clear that once the people of the world find out to
what lengths our leaders have gone in order to keep our civilization alive and afloat they will
accept the facts and will do their part because at that point every human being on the planet
will be an asset in the struggle for our existence and not a liability, as is currently the
case. We must give our fellow human beings the chance to shoulder the burden and the
responsibility for our survival into the future. And only full access to the whole truth and
nothing but the truth will empower them to do that. When that happens no one will be
sacrificed but we will all willingly sacrifice.
Your main point of criticism to the actual system is the deception, the side effects of covert
depop and the disruption of trust between the responsible, but arrogant elites and the
ignorant people?
Yes, in the final analysis we would not be in this situation if our leaders didn’t lack faith in
mankind. And the people wouldn’t be this ignorant and indifferent if the system wasn’t
designed to keep us all ignorant and indifferent. We are conditioned from birth to stop
thinking where the global matrix of control begins and never to ask why the system is the way
it is. And this conditioning is for the convenience of those who lead us and to the detriment
of all of us because we have all been locked in this prison of ignorance while our leaders have
locked themselves in their prison of lies from which they are too afraid to escape because they
fear retribution.
So, in your eyes, our main efforts at this stage should be: A) educating the people about the
realistic dangers of environmental collapse and the vital importance of the sustainability
goals B) to snatch the power of population control out of the hands of the elites to empower
the people who would have to be educated first?13
Yes, that is the correct plan of attack to break free from the prison of ignorance and to assume
command and control over our lives, rights and future. The floodgates of information must be
opened for all at once.
The better question to ask is not who should be educated first but how should this knowledge
be released? And the process has already begun, but is not going as fast as I would like it or
as fast as it needs to. You will have noticed that most movies and TV series nowadays
contain if not a clear than a subliminal message of overpopulation and the need to depopulate
or of environmental destruction and the need to save the planet.
It is high time to release compelling and factual documentaries on the subject backed by
primary evidence from the system’s database. This must be immediately followed by a
common statement from the world’s highest podium, that of the United Nations or from St.
Peter’s Square in Rome, by all heads of state and government standing shoulder to shoulder
with the world’s spiritual leaders, including Pope Francis and Pope Benedict the XVI, as well
as all current heads of the UN system and its affiliated organizations. Their statement must be
a clear and concise admission that population control has been practiced as an international
program through covert methods since 1920 when the League of Nations was founded and
much earlier by the world’s organized religions. They must also state that the time has come
to transfer the responsibility for population control onto the people so that covert and criminal
methods can be abandoned and overt and humane methods can be employed. Then there
must be a full release of the entire population control documentation from all secret archives
and these documents must be rapidly digitized and provided to the world at large without
limitations.
In your book The Future of Global Governance you wrote:
"A state of emergency is much faster and much easier to implement than a socioeconomic transformation, .... A state of emergency can serve as a stepping stone to
a new socio-economic structure if the timing and circumstances, both political and
systemic, are adequate. This state of emergency must be declared at the same time by
all 15 nations that are part of the Deep Decarbonization Pathway Project and that
are responsible for 70% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions"
This may be interpreted as a blueprint for the events haunting us for more than 10 months
now. It looks as if somebody has been reading your book very carefully and selectively picked
out the bits empowering global governance to more authoritarian styles. On reading the UN
Agenda 2030 I also recognized idealistic elements of your book (e.g. poverty, education,
pollution...).
They seemed to have overlooked the "Truth for Trust" part however and don't seem to neither
disclose the depop-program nor step back from continuation of covert depop measures. Do
you think we may experience some future disclosure, i.e. when authoritarian control will have
been achieved to a degree that elites responsible for the past crimes might be better protected
from legal action? And people may pardon them because they will say thank you for saving us
from further pollution, distress and degeneration, thank you for educating us and giving us a
new perspective.
Yes, they cherry picked my work and are using it as a blue print to stabilize the climate and
the population. Unfortunately, they left out the most important part, namely the three
elemental principles I drafted (Truth for Trust Principle, Now and Forever Principle, Family 14
First Principle) and the governing structure I envisioned (the Council of Twelve and the
Twelve Elders). Without them they lack the solid, legal, fair and humane foundation
necessary to succeed.
We will have disclosure only when and if the depopulation by vaccination program fails and
only if we force it out of them. If they provide full disclosure and allow a peaceful transition
of power they will be allowed to live. If not, they will all be executed for crimes against
humanity.
If, however, their depopulation by vaccination program succeeds there may well be no one
left to hold them accountable and they will inherit the world.
They also didn't limit the state of emergency to just the 15 major polluters - but extended it to
virtually the whole world. Do you see this as an indicator for their measures directed not only
to decarbonization but primarily to depopulation of poorer countries?
They did limit the state of emergency to just the G20 nations. On the surface the entire world
participates but on closer scrutiny it becomes clear that only the 15 major polluters have
reduced their greenhouse gas emissions because only they have been subjected to real
lockdowns and other restrictions. Keep in mind that one of the 15 is the EU. I count the EU as
one because the EU has presented a Deep Decarbonization Pathway for the entire Union.
The system’s depopulation objectives will be reached primarily through depop vaccines,
which is what all covid-19 vaccines are. The intentional disruptions to the world’s food
supply chains will cause millions of deaths by famine and undernutrition but will pale by
comparison with the wholesale destruction of human life the vaccines will cause, which is
why they will be mandatory or quasi mandatory, a fact stated in the official documents of the
EU and the US since 2016: (1) European Commission Roadmap on Vaccination, (2) US
National Adult Implementation Plan: A Path to Implementation.
You mentioned the Earth Charter and the euphemism "sustainable development“ to be used
by the super powers USA and Soviet Union as a new instrument reaffirming their commitment
to the depopulation agenda since nuclear deterrence had been invalidated by the cessation of
the Cold War. Do you rate the Paris Climate Agreement, which foresees the world to become
CO2-neutral by 2050, as an intent to implement the sustainability prerogative of the Earth
Charter and its ambitious goal of CO2-neutrality in such short time primarily a pretext of
continued depopulation?
Sustainable development is being used as a front for depopulation, but that does not mean that
it has no merit in and of itself. As I have explained on numerous occasions, sustainability is
not possible without decarbonization and depopulation in equal measure. The system has the
courage to pursue decarbonization openly and to justify the sacrifices imposed on the
population for this reason, but lacks the courage to pursue depopulation openly, as that would
call for full disclosure and the admission that crimes against humanity have been committed
for centuries in order to keep the population within the available resources and within
mankind’s ability to extract and use those resources.
If decarbonization is naturally more accepted than depopulation, why didn’t they honestly
declare a climate emergency like you suggested and instead created a plandemic deceiving 15
the public? Do they use the fear from death and disease to first establish more complete
control systems enabling them to force through overt climate-lockdowns in the future? At one
go they enforce mandatory vaccination upon humankind securing direct access to all human
bodies allowing for more ecological, targeted, AI-controlled depopulation.
Because they need an excuse to vaccinate at least 70% of the population with depop vaccines
and the plandemic gives them that excuse. Under the guise of the plandemic the system can
pursue both objectives at once: depopulation and decarbonization. Governments could not
have justified injecting 70% of their population with depop vaccines by declaring a climate
emergency, but they can do so by declaring a health emergency. The pandemic lockdowns of
the present are also conditioning the people for the climate lockdowns of the future.
If somebody told you: "look, you may be right on the crimes against humanity being
committed through GDPP and its severe consequences to health and environment but at least
we managed to feed the majority of people, we made significant, improvements in health care,
hygiene, prevention of debilitating and deadly infectious diseases by vaccines, we lifted the
socioeconomic status and educational level of ever more people leading to a longer average
life expectancy and increased consumer choice and happiness worldwide, and after all we
prevented nuclear catastrophe. Don’t you think that overall, we did a great job? The majority
of people never wanted to know how we accomplished all those great achievements; they are
incapable and / or unwilling to understand our predicament and to carry all the burdens and
responsibilities we did -therefore they should be grateful … “? What would you contest?
Yes, the accomplishments of the Global Depopulation Policy are extraordinary and
incontestable, and we must all indeed be grateful to those who assumed this heavy burden and
played God in human society. Considering how difficult it is to tame man’s instinct to
procreate and how equally difficult it is to limit people’s aspirations; I can only say that those
who have been in charge have my respect and gratitude. They have done the unthinkable to
accomplish the impossible and we all owe them our lives, damaged though they are. But their
medicine has become more dangerous and damaging than the disease. And their need for
secrecy has perverted and debased everything we hold dear, including our humanity. We can
do better than that, but they stand in the way.
The time has come to transfer this responsibility onto the capable shoulders of mankind so we
can take the next step in our evolution from animals to angels. Continuing to use covert
chemical and biological methods of depopulation will degrade our health and damage our
intellectual and genetic endowment to such an extent as to make our species incapable of
survival within a gene-ration or two. Whether we like it or not, from now on we must all play
God if our civilization is to survive and mankind thrive. It won’t be easy, but we will succeed.
We will succeed because we must.
3. Protagonists of the GDPP – Vatican - UN - WHO – Military - Governments -
Corporations
You were accusing the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a “bioterrorist
organization”. In one of your books you described the HIV/AIDS pandemic that has been
ravaging Africa for the past thirty years as a man-made mass killing event in the same
tradition as the bubonic plague and the 1918 Spanish flue. Could you substantiate these 16
claims? Is there any clear evidence that HIV, Bubonic plague and Spanish flue were
deliberately released?
There is plenty of documentary evidence, but it is buried in the Vatican Secret Archives and
the secret databases of the US, Russia and the UK, the Allied powers that are behind the
depopulation program since the formation of the UN. The Bubonic plague outbreaks that
have ravaged Europe from the 14th to the 17th centuries, the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic and
the HIV pandemic of the 20th century all bear the fingerprint of the depopulation lobby and
their genocidal methodology. I explained this briefly in my paper The Holy Grail: Controlling
Human Life on the Planet. My upcoming book, however, will tackle this subject in detail. I
will start writing it this August and I will publish it towards the end of 2022.
In a different paper you even suggested that Russian and US Intelligence/Military were
presumably masterminding and cooperating the divulgation of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa,
Haiti and Brazil using smallpox vaccines as a vector. Do you believe those executing forces
did act in accordance with the Vatican ethical codex? A deadly mission of such a scale will
involve the collaboration of quite a few people and they will all have to be complicit and
silenced. How do you think - can this be kept secret?
The Vatican is fully and solely in charge of the ethical framework. Governments draft policies
respecting the ethical framework dictated by the Vatican. And the military-industrial complex
manufactures and delivers the poisons used for depopulation in accordance with the directives
they receive from governments. Secular authorities to not deviate an inch from the Vatican’s
boundaries because they are in power for just a few years and know they can be held
accountable if they take matters into their own hands when the government changes. The
depopulation lobby is perfectly capable of keeping secrets. It has been doing this successfully
for more than two thousand years by simply killing those who speak and who have this
knowledge because they were allowed into the system and groomed accordingly.
What do you think about countries with predominantly non-Christian / non-Catholic
populations? How are their governments getting convinced of abiding to Vatican rules? Is
there a lot of international political or even military pressure on these governments
reinforcing their adherence to the papal framework?
Non-Christian countries are threatened with war. I have been in contact with several heads of
state from Africa and Latin America and they have confessed that unless they go along with
the depop program they will face war. What has happened in the Middle East for the past
thirty years is the result of the depopulation program in action in countries whose leaders have
refused to cooperate with the international system and poison their own people into sterility.
The same applies to Afghanistan and more recently to Yemen. What could not be
accomplished by reducing births is being accomplished by increasing deaths. In the struggle
to control population growth death is as valuable as life.
In your book “Peace Without Poison” published in 2015 you mentioned the role of
international cooperatives like DynCorp International Inc. (Toxins for Chemtrails), Monsanto
corporation inc. (artificial sweeteners, fluorides, glyphosate = Roundup, DDT, the organic
environmental toxin PCB and since the late 1980s genetically modified organisms = GMOs), 17
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Sterilizing Vaccines, GMO) and Plastics Europe
(Bisphenol A, Bisphenol S, numerous other hormone disruptors in plastic packaging) being
entrusted with the technical side of the GDPP. Recently you suggested a possible role of the
Battelle Memorial Institute to manage the entire American bioterrorism apparatus. Battelle
came out with Xerox who produces neurotoxic Isodecane for dry-copying. Isodecane can
cause loss of smell and taste among others. In how far do clear lines exist between the
leadership ranks of those corporations and governments? How many people in your estimate
are involved in the GDPP and can you see any entity being the driving force of the GDPP?
I estimate the inner circle to have no more than 20,000 people, the middle circle 200,000 and
the outer circle 2 million people. The driving force is the Vatican. It has the longest
experience in population control and delineates the ethical outlines of the depopulation
program for secular authorities. Outside Christendom the spiritual leaders of other organized
religions play only an advisory role to secular authorities. The West follows the guidelines set
by the Vatican and never deviates from them, as that would incur the wrath of the Church,
which to this day has the power to topple almost any government on earth through its
countless proxies. The Global Depopulation Program rests on the following four lines of text
from the encyclical letter Humanae Vitae, subtitled On the Regulation of Birth, published 25
July 1968:
“On the other hand, the Church does not consider at all illicit the use of those
therapeutic means necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a foreseeable
impediment to procreation should result there from—provided such impediment is
not directly intended for any motive whatsoever”.
The areas of jurisdiction are respected since the separation of Church and State. The Church
makes the moral law. The State follows the Church’s moral law and operates within the
ethical loopholes provided by the Church. The military-industrial complex manufactures and
administers the poisons chosen by governments. The judiciary provides legal protection for
the crimes committed by governments and the military-industrial complex. The media hides
the evidence, spins the facts and conditions the masses with lies and half-truths. And civil
society pretends to fight the system while being funded by it.
This circle of crime, however, is tightknit only in Christendom, since only here it has been
2000 years in the making, elsewhere it is hanging by a thread and can be broken with a single
push.
The central role of the Battelle Memorial Institute in the plandemic era will be elucidated in
my upcoming paper “Criminal Strategies for Sustainability: The Geopolitics of
Decarbonization by Plandemic and Depopulation by Vaccination”. For now suffice it to
say that there is no doubt whatsoever that Battelle is the coordinating agency of the plandemic
strategy. And this is very easy to prove. Unfortunately, due to lack of time and funding I
won’t be able to publish this evidence until late September.
Why did the Vatican oppose hormonal or mechanical contraceptives then?
Because it cannot change its own teachings on contraceptives due to its Doctrine of Papal
Infallibility, which dates back to 1870 and states that Popes are preserved from the possibility
of error. The Church is in other words caught by the rigidity of its own dogma - a dogma18
adopted to hang on to its moral and spiritual authority when it lost its territorial possessions to
the newly formed Italian state.
The Doctrine of Papal Infallibility in the practical sense of the Church’s stance on birth
control prevents the Church from changing its position, for if the current Pope were to alter
the Church’s position on contraceptives he would invalidate the infallibility of his predecessor
and therefore prove that no Pope is infallible. And without the Doctrine of Papal Infallibility
the Church would lose its absolute authority on matters of ethics and morality, which is all it
has left.
And that goes to show you that the West needs a new spiritual authority and belief system.
Christianity has become obsolete. The same applies, of course, to all other organized
religions, which is why I say that what the world needs is a New Axial Age and not a New
World Order.
Defending papal infallibility definitely has always been an important motive in Vatican’s
politics. But don’t you think the Vatican primarily wanted to protect women’s (and their
mate’s) health by preventing them from potentially detrimental effects of hormone-disrupting
contraceptives? For instance, as you outlined in “Peace without Poison” in Andorra the
governing Bishops reluctantly agreed to water fluoridation in the 1960s for sterilizing
purposes whilst firmly adhering to their reticence to contraceptives. In Vatican’s ethics the
living appears to be higher rated than the unborn.
One could argue that the Church tried to protect people from having to make the tough
decision of aborting, which is why it allowed governments to prevent the moment of
conception so that people wouldn’t be forced to kill their own fetuses in order to limit their
family size. And I believe this indeed to be the case, which is why I have been indulgent with
the Church and empathetic to its unenviable predicament. The Vatican could not know that
covert chemical methods of sterilization more often than not lead to death in the womb rather
than the prevention of conception, a fact I describe in my 2016 peer-reviewed article “Behind
the Mask: Malaria Eradication and Involuntary Sterilization”. Now, however, the Church
knows yet despite this knowledge it refuses to change its ways, which is why I am no longer
indulgent with the Church.
I would not quite agree on the assumption that Vatican’s ethics does unequivocally allow for
intentional impediment of human fertility in the pretext of medical treatment since it requires
that “…-such impediment is not directly intended for any motive whatsoever”. The
masterminding of a GDPP intentionally turning medical treatments or preventive measures
into chemical warfare against human fertility would therefore not be in line with the
encyclical letter Humanae Vitae from 1968 you quoted – at least not in line with what is
written out. Is there some hidden double meaning in this phrase, too?
The words “not directly intended for any motive whatsoever” are just for the Church’s
protection. The Church never gets its hands dirty and never takes responsibility for any of the
high crimes it enables. Its proxies, be they governments or institutions, take the fall.19
4. The role of pandemics vaccines as controllable instruments in modern depopulation
In your article Turning Nature Against Man you have shown that vaccines as ultimately
controllable instruments of covert or even open population control were increasingly favored
by the UN over chemically-induced sterility and morbidity since “…more ambitious
depopulation targets via vaccine-induced apoptosis through mandatory immunization
programs were being phased in”.
One of the most remarkable aspects of the actual Covid-Crisis is that governments of almost
all countries proclaim mass-vaccination as the only solution on our way back to normality.
And this despite the fact, that the factual extent of this so-called pandemic does by no means
justify such drastic infringements on human rights. Global Politics here seems to insist on a
gamble solution of a created problem since up to date there has never been a safe and
efficient vaccine against a Corona Virus nor has there any safe vaccine based on RNA- / or
DNA methodology. Do you agree that mandatory vaccination laws being pushed upon us in
the wake of CV hysteria would pave the way for a new generation of selective, eugenic depopstrategies?
Absolutely! The system is changing its methodology of population control from covert
chemical methods (i.e. endocrine disruptors inserted in our food and drinks) to coercive
biological methods of population control (i.e. mandatory vaccines) because it needs to
selectively target different populations for different outcomes. The countries that have
reached the last stage of the demographic transition / depopulation program and have as a
result inverted population pyramids, thus too many old and too few young to bear the burden
of the old, need to reduce the number of elderly from the current 30% of the population to
below 20% if they are to prevent economic collapse. The countries that are only at the
beginning of the demographic transition / depopulation program need to sterilize the young in
order to bring down the total fertility rate to well below replacement level, thus to fewer than
two children per woman. And the countries that are in the middle of the demographic
transition / depopulation program need to do a bit of both.
The covert chemical methods of population control used thus far do not allow this kind of
selectivity. That is why the system is changing its weapons of population control. Without
the selectivity afforded by vaccines governments cannot complete the depopulation genocide.
Countries with demographic Transition Stages 1-3 (e.g. Sub-Saharan States, India,
Afghanistan) would qualify for sterilizing vaccines. Adding the pregnancy hormone beta HCG
to the vaccine (already applied in Kenia), triggering autoimmunity to hormonal glands and in
case of CV-19 to placenta tissue - possibly facilitated by the Syncytin – homologue proteins in
CV-19 spikes being produced by the cells being inoculated with the vaccine. These proteins
play an essential role in placenta development and chronic immune reactions to them would
render women infertile. In contrast to lowering total fertility in developing countries with
high birth rates, progressed demographic stages 4-5 with over-aging issues and inverted
population pyramids would qualify for vaccines designed to shorten life spans.
Immunocompromise, infections, apoptosis and telomere shortening for premature cell aging
and death to name but a few potentially vaccine induced biochemical mechanisms suited to
covertly accelerate somebody’s death. The eugenic component could be guaranteed by IA
technology - making sure that only the best will be enjoying their deserved jubilation and
maintain their natural right of procreation...20
It seems like the elites are fiercely pushing in that direction and it’s hard to see anybody
stopping them right now. The masterminded fear-guilt-agenda still seems to work their magic
on the masses. The invisible enemy being a virus and its instrumentalization to get rid of
Donald Trump has furthermore helped to occupy classical liberal and civil rights camps.
They seem to buy into the solidarity deceit and sell out their democratic foundation for
imaginary security and health. What would be your cure for current collective delusion?
That is precisely the plan. And it can be easily stopped by the masses if at least 20% of the
population open their eyes and become torchbearers of truth. But then what? The plan might
as well be allowed to continue if the masses are unwilling and incapable of assuming
responsibility and making sacrifices to limit fertility, lower populations and lifespans and
accomplish optimal and therefore sustainable population levels. That is why the only way out
of this is to make the depopulation agenda known to enough people that the depopulation by
vaccination strategy fails and then to put enough pressure on governments to change course
and transfer the responsibility for population control from governments onto the people in a
peaceful and civilized manner. The current delusion will end when those vaccinated stop
procreating and start dying.
You would expect very counter-instinctive behavior by the masses - I suppose that most
people are simply not ready to self-limit procreation and lifespan - neither will they want to
limit circulation and/or consumption in order to save the climate. Ideally people would like to
emancipate themselves from tyranny and bring personal sacrifices for democracy. But
realistically the majority appears far too angsty and comfort -/ distraction-seeking in order to
assume responsibility- be it with respect to reproductive, social, ecological, financial or
political issues. The actual fear and uncertainty deliberately provoked by CV19 seems to
induce a lot of allowed for adherence to the status quo. This implies the broad public
insistence for more authority in order to save the political system (representing protective
father and continuity) which paradoxically now is exactly the source of unpredictable change
and instability. A second effect of fear has always been the loss of tolerance and the increase
in ever changing micro-racisms – so some people will turn to political extremes. The chances
of forging an international alliance of enlightened, emancipated individuals ready to assume
global responsibility are therefore limited.
The masses are more scared of a state of anarchy than from the elites’ intentions to continue
making the world a safer, greener and healthier place by killing us softly. Ironically, it’s the
same elites who created and control the armory of mass destruction they are protecting us
from...
In a strict materialistic matrix of thought it appears as if there are not many alternatives to
elites’ best intentions. They will continue installing their authoritarian super surveillance
program and hopefully change from covert chemical or microbiological and overt surgical
methods to more humane, eco-friendly and targeted methods like mass-vaxx or China-like
political legalization.
There is one alternative, the one I have provided in The Future of Global Governance. My
alternative is the only workable and sane one and sooner or later, once the system’s strategies
fail one after the other, the world will adopt my plan. That much is certain.
Mass vaccination is not a more humane method of population control. It is more of the same
thing. And it may well prove to be the most devastating to human health. The population will 21
assume responsibility, but to do so it must first know what the real situation is and how the
system has carried on thus far, which means there has to be full disclosure. Once the people
have the facts they will come to the same conclusion as those who already have all the facts,
namely that there are only two ways of doing this: top down or bottom up. And the people
will assume responsibility because they will want to live and be in control of their lives.
Isn’t it also the same elites who are creators and major profiteers of a system of addictive
hyper-consumption and inherent personal alienation who successfully escape any
accountability here? Interestingly there is a conflict of interest within the elites who need us
in numbers as their servants and consumers alike but at the same time they seemed to have
changed the paradigm from instant-growth to a period of mandatory economic restriction -
including accentuated depop (= short-term decarbonization, great reset, Schwab, WEF). So,
the greed and crave for dominion may eventually save us from short term mass extinction?
Once AI is introduced on a wide scale the elites will no longer need the masses. The greed
and crave for dominion will not save us from anything but condemn us to failure and
extinction. The change of paradigm from hyper- to hypo-consumption buys us a little time,
but cannot be maintained over the long-run because we live and work to live better not worse.
5. Geopolitical vision, social and ethical implications
Agreed on mass-vaxx-dangers - was a bit sarcastic about the issue. I admire a lot what you
did so far in terms of elucidating the facts to a broader public and I definitely advocate for
public enlightenment, the idea of a sovereign people and favor plural bottom up to uniformity
top down in all aspects - particularly in medicine. Ideally there would be not up or down but
more even political and personal relations. Full disclosure and admittance of these
scandalous facts to the broad public though would entail legal actions against those in
charge and require a thorough reprocessing of political and military order. It would also
require a clear vision on where to go in the future and a redefinition of the traditional ethical
concepts of dignity, human rights and, perhaps, a new social contract. It looks very much as if
the CV19-plot was created to push top-down-depop a bit further.
I’m still wondering what the concrete intentions of the elites are with CV 19: more short term
depop or rather strategic? Do you think that break down of supply chains, lockdowns,
recessions are provoked primarily to kill people short term or rather strategically to increase
the surge for a “New World Order”?
A clear vision of where to go in the future is needed and I have provided that too in the form
of the OM Principles, fifteen simple principles on which to base a new system and a new
social contract.
The transition from this system to the one I envisioned will be difficult, no doubt about it. If
those in charge refuse to hand over the reins of power the transition will be very bloody,
extremely destabilizing and it will take decades. If on the other hand, they cooperate it will be
peaceful, and it could be done in just a decade.
The objectives of the plandemic strategy are rather clear: depopulation and decarbonization.
The golden future promised by the World Economic Forum will be enjoyed only by those
who are still alive once the decarbonization and depopulation programs are accomplished. 22
Judging by the aggressiveness with which depop vaccines are pushed down our throats I
suspect at least 25% of the population will perish by the middle of this century, but it could
well be 50% or more.
The breakdown of supply chains, the lockdowns and the recession are not provoked primarily
to kill people, but to reduce consumption and thus greenhouse gas emissions in order to
decarbonize and save the climate. In so doing governments live up to the pledges they made
when they signed the Paris Accord. At least 200 million people, however, will die of hunger
and poverty around the world due to the hardship created by this intentional sabotage of the
global economy. That is how the system intends to solve the problem of extreme poverty.
And depending how long governments sabotage the economy for decarbonization purposes
we may well see half a billion people perish due to hunger, poverty and desperation. The
system is easing the population load by throwing the weak, the poor, the sick and the old off
board because the ship of human civilization is taking on water and will otherwise sink.
Replacing individualism and critical thinking with blind obedience and the servant’s
mentally, abolishing cash, screen deal, preparing surveillance, and mass vaccination
infrastructure for the 'more deadly viruses' to come would all pay off in the long term and
give more options for top-down depopulation. Do they push to a sort of global welfare state
capitalist system - meaning limiting personal freedom, restrictive family planning, shortened
life spans in change for wealth, social security, less inequality among the commons,
unconditional salary until AI-assisted, individualized timely kill off?
They will try to convince people to accept the imposition of limits to their fertility, mobility,
longevity and rights in exchange for a more stress-free and worry-free existence though also a
far more modest existence. Many will be more than happy to accept this trade-off, but many
others and perhaps many more will not.
A welfare state system is also dictated by rapid advances of technology and the aggressive
adoption of artificial intelligence, which will displace half the people from their jobs in the
next thirty years. Those who cannot be killed fast enough by vaccines or starvation will be
kept in a state of debilitating poverty through the introduction of the universal basic income.
This reads like an intended fundamental change in human rights and liberties having takenfor-granted up to now at least in the liberal West. I'm asking myself how democracy or at
least some checks and balances could be maintained in the pursuit of such unusual reforms,
challenging our traditional concepts of humanity.
The only solution is to close the gap between individual, national, global and planetary
prerogatives - something I have been calling for repeatedly over the past five years - and
which can be done only by providing full disclosure and thus educating and empowering the
public to assume responsibility. Part and parcel of this solution must also be a radical
redistribution of work and wealth along the lines of my OM Principles.
For now, the elites have taken to a more authoritarian style of government and people
preponderantly seem to accept it as a necessity in the "fight against the virus". Wouldn't it be
far too risky for the elites to disclose the global depop / decarb strategy as a real purpose of
Covid. This would easily undermine their privileged leading position and probably lead to 23
legal and illegal action against them. So why should they deliberately choose to give back
liberty or to empower the people they have been treating so harshly?
Because their strategy is based on secrecy and deception and I have shattered the secrecy and
deception. It is only a matter of time until enough people find my work and turn on the
system. If those in charge wait that long they will be wiped out by the mob and nothing and
no one will save them. Self-preservation is therefore the primary justification for providing
full disclosure and transferring responsibility and with it power to the people.
Full disclosure has to be provided by all heads of state and government and all spiritual
leaders from the world’s highest podium. It should be preceded by the release of an explicit
and detailed documentary of the history of the depopulation program and followed by the
release of all population control documentation and its digitization.
Machiavelli once wrote that the ruler has to either be benevolent or ferocious - he should by
all means avoid being both at a time since it will lead to disaster. Now as the hard way has
been chosen - is there in your opinion a non-violent way "back" to our accustomed illusion of
political participation and proclaimed sovereignty of the people? And what would the
political structure look like in a global, worry-free, AI-assisted state capitalist welfare state
with limited consumption, circulation, fertility and life-span?
Yes, there is a non-violent way back to self-determination, by creating a Planetary Wellbeing
Authority and deploying the three elemental principles and the solutions I describe in my
book The Future of Global Governance. At the same time the OM Principles will have to be
adopted by the new social and economic construct. Once the population is stabilized at a
sustainable level and mankind guided and empowered by a single global authority our
descendants will enjoy a better standard of living than we can even imagine. How fast we
get there depends on how fast we have full disclosure.
In “The Future of Global Governance” you outlined a comparatively open and transparent
form of global government based on a new planetary identity of earthlings transcending
nationalistic, ideological, religious and egoistic blinkers. Your three visionary prerogatives of
the new power structure would be “Truth for Trust” between commons and ruling class, “The
Now- and Forever-Principle” (ecologically sustainable population numbers, economy and
forms of co-existence respecting our planetary boundaries) and “Family First Principle”
(you are adhering here to the conservative concept of a small nuclear family as hatchery and
basic building block of society). To me, all three prerogatives seem valid demands for a
possibly better future. The central global government in your model yet would be provided
with far more power than today and it might be even farer away from the real and regional
needs of the people. Everybody’s identity would have to change considerably, and we would
have to overcome traditional and contrarious beliefs and identifications for the greater good.
The new social contract would implicate considerable relinquishment of perceived
sovereignty.
Do you consider such a global and fundamental change of traditional “world order” - a
tremendously centralizing step- to be politically enforceable in relatively short time amidst
growing nationalism and micro-racisms? Will adherence to the concept of nationality still
make any sense in such an NWO or would it rather be strict regionalism combined with a
lean global government?24
People are tired of national governments and their impotence. People are tired of the illusion
of democracy and the rule of law. People are tired of the inequities, the corruption and the
lies the current system offends us with. People are tired of being prisoners of the nation-state,
an obsolete political entity that locks us all behind national borders and perpetuates a world of
conflict along artificially created lines of division. Yes, people will accept a global authority
like the one I envisioned because it will offer a far greater standard of governance than the
national and international authorities we now have and a far nobler system than the grotesque
one we now have.
The nation-state is already dead. It exists only on paper and only to restrict the rights and
liberties of the masses. The elites have been living in a borderless world for at least two
decades. It is time we have the same privileges, which can only be afforded by a borderless
world and a seamless global system under a planetary government that is accountable to us,
the people, and protects all life on earth. We can no longer bear the weight of 200
governments. A lean global government will cost us almost nothing and will free us of
bureaucracy, duplication of services, waste, armies, armaments and a thousand other awful
things. The world will be our oyster. Cultures will thrive because they are regional and have
always been regional, but we will also share a global and common culture. No borders will
separate us. No invented enemies will plague our existence. No parasitical military-industrial
complexes will suck our life blood. No party politics will ever sell us their lies and false
promises. No corporation will ever again exploit us.
The shortcoming of the past to reach such an ideal state of global political consciousness and
power structure amidst stronger monetary ties and growing economic globalization of
international corporations is evident. Would you interpret this as an autocratic strategy of the
elites to undermine the very concept of basic-democratic politics to be an independent
retributive force between conflicting interests of different social and economical groups? Do
we have instead an internationally operating, corrupted super-upper-class, an elitist
financial-industrial-military-political complex (FIMP) ruling in mutual accordance and
support whilst eluding democratic legitimacy and accountability? The creation of an almighty
central world-government wouldn’t only bear the risk of corruption and abuse but for now
would mean nothing but a formal handover of the remainings of independent politics to
FIMP. Personally, I think we first have to achieve some drastic disentanglement of FIMP and
impose a new concept of profit-avoiding money in order to become a world government a
success in terms of both - democracy and sustainability.
Only a fully transparent world government operating along the principles I defined can
dissolve the financial-industrial-military-political complex you describe. The existing FIMP
is the result of a strategy devised in the 1980s to advance global unity through economic
power, which is indeed a step-up from previous attempts at global unity, which were based on
raw military power. It is therefore an intentionally created monster that was birthed so the
nation-state could be ploughed down. Its existence will no longer be needed in a world
devoid of nations and united under a world government.
For now, the most realistic possibility seems to me that people will first become strict
believers in the new Corona-religion which imposes new laws and rules upon us which are at
first perceived as counter-intuitive. It will be possible to impose those rules because they are 25
collectively believed and because they will be abided by due to collective fear, autosuggestion
and mutual peer pressure.
In the course of time those rules will have become our new normality, some sacrifices will
have been made, some traditional things of course been abolished. The air may be cleaner,
the skies blue, the grass greener, stress levels lower for some, higher for others. But will we
still need the structurally religious frame and the threat of sanctions to maintain these
behaviors or will people emancipate themselves and come to a truly humane, auto-determined
way of self-organization towards sustainable forms of living?
How- in your eyes - could a transition of power and legitimacy from the elitist shadowautocracy to actual overt autocratic virocracy towards true democracy be accomplished
whilst avoiding too much social derangement and chaos?
The Corona-religion cannot be sustained because it is based on blatantly obvious lies and
offers no benefit to anyone nor is it attractive in any way. Quite the contrary it offends us in
every possible way. People perceived it as a perversion from the very beginning and now that
we have all been at the receiving end of this perversion for an entire year the Corona-religion
is more despised than ever. Compliance with the restrictions imposed under the guise of the
plandemic is weaning across the world. People comply only because they fear fines and
imprisonment, in other words only because they fear the power of the state, which has
become totalitarian.
The fear that fueled the Corona-religion is also gone. It was the fear of death by an invisible
enemy. But now that a majority of people are aware that the invisible enemy doesn’t actually
exist the only fear that remains is that of governments out of control.
A smooth transition to a system that can solve our collective problems without committing
genocide and crimes against humanity can only be accomplished if full disclosure is provided
and the existing power structure moves out of the way and makes room for a Planetary
Wellbeing Authority with global enforcement powers. The truth will set us free and set us on
the right course.
These players would be operating unknowingly of their purpose. This doesn’t seem very
transparent either – no? And having somebody on top, even if competent as you, wouldn’t
provide necessary democratic control and accountability.
The Council of Twelve and the Twelve Elders that I envision at the head of this global
authority will be operating fully transparent and with clearly stated objectives. These
individuals, who will have final authority on all matters of existential importance for our
species, will not utter a single word that will not become part of the public record
immediately. However, there can be no democratic control over this Planetary Wellbeing
Authority since it protects not only the rights of the living but also of future generations and
of all life on earth and neither the unborn nor the other species on earth could be represented
at a democratic table. To ensure that these all-powerful individuals maintain the highest
standards of governance and pursue mankind’s best interests, I must have veto power and the
tie-breaking vote on all matters decided by them.
Furthermore, we don’t have democracy now nor did we ever have democracy. What we have
had and continue to have is the illusion of democracy. Under a fully transparent global 26
authority we will at least know what is going on and why and we will not be poisoned to death
with endocrine disruptors or vaccinated to death with depop vaccines. We will all be assets in
the struggle for our existence and not liabilities, as is currently the case.
6. Manufactured Health – Crisis, psychological and biological effects – collective burnout
In respect to the virus itself - they seemed to have implemented a quite efficient technique of
real-surreal-theater. Real local release of contagious agents, changing hospital triage system
to have few hospitals running over & selectively reporting those hospitals in the media, fake
statistics by misattributions of deaths or symptoms to an invalid positive PCR tests,
manipulative coincidence by increasing test-numbers during annual Rhinovirus epidemics
(end of October, March), implementing illogical rules and measures to make things look even
more dramatic to keep the angry men from the streets, involve celebrities in all fields to be
CV-victims, do not search for other causes of death, dramatize in every respect to paralyze
people’s reflection and resistance, stipulate long-term effects which in fact cannot be proven
at this stage. In recent months, official statistics increasingly stipulated excess-mortality
usually based on incomplete and arbitrarily selected data in order to keep people following
the narrative, concerned and abiding to unproven non-scientific restrictions and
infringements on their rights. Is it another technique to lie by avoiding lying (deprecated by
monotheist religions) but by data selection and disclosure/ omission of essential facts?
The people in the system are fully aware that their entire pandemic narrative will collapse if
they release the real mortality rates, which show no increased all-cause mortality in those
countries where we have been able to obtain the data through backdoor channels. No
increased mortality means there is no pandemic and if there is no pandemic than there is no
killer virus on the loose either. I have requested the all-cause mortality rates for the 27 EU
nations from EUROSTAT, the EU’s statistical agency, three times and was refused access
every time. The most I received was a statement that the stats will be released in July. More
than this, the EU is withholding the stats from 2019, too. They are doing this not only to hide
that there is no increased mortality in 2020 but also to hide the many deaths from vaccines,
and from denial of medical care, that will happen in 2021 by counting them as 2020 deaths.
In other words, they will hide the sharp increase in mortality in 2021 due to the vaccines by
falsely attributing those deaths to covid-19 infections and counting them as deaths that have
occurred in 2020.
In the meantime, the only data they release is completely fabricated so-called “excess
mortality rates”, which is garbage data pulled out of a hat to maintain the illusion of people
dying due to Covid 19.
“If you torture the numbers long enough they will confess to anything” is a popular quote on
the principles of statistics. Excess mortality figures usually imply quite a degree of
arbitrariness and are prone to spinning. What counts is complete figures on mortality,
population size, reference collective all in absolute numbers and sorted according to age
categories. In addition, the causes of death would have to be determined with scientific
scrutiny and there needs to be a valid significance calculation before stipulating any excess
mortality.27
Precisely, but they are beyond that now. They have crossed all red lines and in so doing have
lost all credibility and have destroyed not only the credibility of the state but also, and more
importantly, the credibility of the medical profession and of the scientific community. They
maintain the illusion of a pandemic with junk science and junk data, which invalidates any
and all official statements. We might as well have monkeys peeling data out of ripe bananas
since the result is the same as parroting officials presenting manufactured data.
Did they also cross the red line of deliberately shortening life spans (in previous times =
murder/mass extinction)? Quite a number of officials resigned in the last year because they
could not reconcile these fact-remote politics with their scientific integrity.
Shortening lifespans in countries that have reached the last stage of the demographic
transition / depopulation program is the very first objective pursued by the system with the
plandemic strategy. So long as only the terminally ill are helped or allowed to die and those
old and frail enough to wish to end their lives the system remains safely behind the red line.
It remains to be seen if covid-19 vaccines are lethal only to these two categories or if the
system has decided to cross all red lines and kill everyone who is a drag on the system.
A lot of people resigned across the board but still keep quiet. Their integrity stops where their
income begins. They could not bring themselves to lie to the public, but they remain quiet to
enjoy the benefits of being in the system. It should be noted that high officials, people
carrying diplomatic passports and people on official duty can travel across borders without
Covid- 19 tests or vaccines, in other words without having to subject themselves to
depopulation poisons.
That many have resigned because they could not bring themselves to violate their scientific or
moral integrity goes to show you that the officials who took their place have no such qualms.
They are in other words the scum of the earth.
But there were enough till now to make a great number of people think and wake up.
This should give some hope.
This gives hope only to the extent that these individuals represent the weak links in the
criminal chain and the moment enough people rise they will turn on their counterparts who
did lie to the public every day and thus chose to play central and public roles.
Due to prolonged stress, fear and uncertainty a good many of people are still paralyzed. They
adopted apocalyptic avoidance attitudes and they find themselves in a twisted fear-guilt-peerpressure trap. The desire of apocalypse roots in repression of death on a broad social scale.
Blocking out and tabooing such an existential element of life will create a surge for its
reappearance and as apocalypse is a collective event it takes away the loneliness - factor of
the original fear object (= individual death) which allows for more comfortable, collective
mechanisms overcoming it. Blocking out an essential factor of life will also lead to a nonauthentic form of existence which creates latent fear as the basis of oppression. Concerning
apocalyptic world views, it is well known that apocalyptic visions or fear and their political,
religious and economic exploitation has been going on in every generation for at least 3000
years.28
Nowadays we can frequently observe a psychological phenomenon which I described as
“coronified personality disorder (CPD)”. The root of CPD is an excess of false moral and
social norm preventing people from following their natural life-supporting instincts whilst
applying critical thinking and common sense. Any form of norm-transgression or aggression
is negatively sanctioned with guilt-blaming and social exclusion. Absence of essential fearreducing factors like hope, trust, confidence, reassuring real-relations and self-empowerment
further create an infantile-dependent type of person being forced into a pseudo religious
belief-system and its repressive cult. CPDs are non-authentic, insecure and obedient human
beings deprived of their punch and fearful of their own anger and aggression created as the
logical consequence of all the frustration infringed upon us.
The aggression instead of being positively transformed into constructive dissolving power and
action is split off the personality and projected to a contagious agent. The malevolent and
omnipotent virus and his supporters are staged as hostile objects of collective fear and
repugnance. Peer pressure plays an essential role in CPD as a false and intimidated person
deprived of their true identity will desperately need a reference collective, a peer group in
order to stabilize by identification. CPD - for the same reasons - will ask for more authority
to frame their blurred perceptions and guideline the behavior.
Repressing death may well be the cause of apocalyptic desire, though I have yet to meet
anyone wishing for the apocalypse. I can tell you however that the antiseptic way in which the
West deals with death is unhealthy as it shelters people from having to confront death as a
part of life. I remember as a child growing up in Romania that my friends and I often went to
homes and apartments in the neighborhood where a person had died, and the family was in
wake, that is to say friends and family watched over the cadaver for three days and nights and
the dead person was placed on a table for all to see. We kids were fascinated by the dead and
confronting death put us in a meditative mood and gave rise to all kinds of speculations about
the afterlife, karma, heaven, hell, purgatory and other such esoteric concepts. In the West,
however, no one has the chance to confront death like this. The dead are handled by
professional morticians and all funerals are closed casket and take a couple of hours.
The “coronified personality disorder” you describe is a reflection of the cowardice and
stupidity of the common man who refuses to think and refuses to act. They are the obedient
folks who come from lineages of peasants conditioned to bow their heads to authority. You
have described the same thing in polite terms.
Peer pressure is strong and universal. What I have noticed, however, is that only the weak are
subject to peer pressure. Since the weak form at least 90% of our species, peer pressure is a
powerful tool that governments shamelessly use and abuse nowadays. And it works. One need
only look at the facial mask phenomenon. Here in Romania no one enforces the wearing of
masks anymore because the police have not been paid by the government for all the overtime
they did during 2020 and have also frozen their salaries now that austerity measures have
kicked in. Nevertheless, everyone walks around with a mask on.
Apart from doomsday scenarios lots of wild conspiracies are going the circuit involving
systematic human trafficking, child abuse, pedo-criminality, Satanist rituals widespread
among political elites and other celebrities. They are often associated with, Jeffrey Epstein,
Pizzagate, the FED, the Rothschilds etc…
Do you think there is something to this or is it rather used to distract, further intimidate and
paralyze the public? 29
These are definitely distractions invented by the system to control the public discourse and to
lead people astray. They are also designed to confuse and confound the public so that no one
can tell anymore what is real and what is fake and thus resign themselves to information from
official sources. It is rather easy to recognize a fake story fabricated by the system because it
is pushed by thousands of people who work for the system (or by AI), appears everywhere at
once, and is produced professionally, which means it benefits from generous funding.
By flooding the social media with fake news, the system has also created the justification for
censoring the social media platforms in order to “protect” the public from fake news.
In my medical practice (as an anti- or good-aging specialist I am obviously a natural
antagonist to depopulation on the late end) we check for regenerative adrenal hormones like
DHEA and Pregnenolone and we all realized a sharp decline in Pregnenolone in almost all
our patients in the last 2 month - meaning continued-stress-related impairment of nerve
regeneration, reflection, memory, increased inflammation, accelerated physical and mental
decay. I'm asking myself whether all this has been masterminded too in a sense of short term
depop?
Yes, the rapid decay you observe in your patients has certainly been masterminded. It is the
result of covert chemical poisoning with endocrine disruptors, manufactured economic
pressures, and deliberately unhealthy work-life balances, to mention but a few of the causes.
Add to these the imprisonment of people in their own homes for extended periods of time
(which leads to cabin fever for the vast majority), the lack of physical movement (which leads
to obesity), the absence of social interaction (which leads to emotional problems), the fear of
death from an invisible enemy (which explodes the incidence of hypochondria), the mandate
to wear a mask at all times (which leads to hypoxic-ischemic injury to the brain and
irreversible neuronal death), and fear of the authorities and of being fined or imprisoned and
losing your job (which leads to constant terror) and you have a complete nightmare scenario
sustained 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. The cumulative stress caused by
this nightmare scenario will lead the weakest members of society to suicide and will cause
serious chronic illnesses and mass death in the population at large.
We saw a marked drop particularly in the last 3 months – Pregnenolone in quite a few
patients went down to almost zero. Something new to us, it has never been observed in the last
8 years - since we started measuring Pregnenolone.
Pregnenolone-deficiency as a pre-burn-out state and adrenal burnout as a likely aggravating
consequence if elevated stress-levels are to be continued will always affect severity and
tenacity of any infectious disease. Low Pregnenolone in particular does impede nerve
regeneration, that’s why it is the most common hormonal cause of Alzheimers. It therefore is
conceivable that we will see severer and more prolonged cases of all kinds of infections, more
nerve impairment and increased mortality particularly in people naturally short of
Pregnenolone, e.g. Addison disease, adrenal burn-out, Post-traumatic-stress disorder and the
elderly. My first consideration was that people are getting more and more worn down by
prolonged fear (from virus and socio-economic consequences), uncertainty and social
friction/polarization lasting longer than 6 months. Do you think that in addition to these
psychological factors, food or air poisoning with hormone disruptors was deliberately
increased too - in the wake of Covid - distractions so to say? 30
Yes, and I suspect that in addition to hormone disruptors the system has used at least one
neurotoxin to cause symptoms similar to a bad flu - such as fever, tiredness, and muscle
soreness - but also indicative of chemical poisoning, namely loss of smell (anosmia) and taste
(ageusia). You are in a better position to establish if a neurotoxin could also be responsible for
the depletion of Pregnenolone.
It is conceivable, that any mitochondrial blocker in the environment (independent from a
smell- /taste impairing neurotoxin) might further contribute to low Pregnenolone by limiting
its biosynthesis.
7. Alternatives to depopulation – socio-economic changes
To be honest: Depop - be it deliberately by choice and insight or in murderous top-downfashion does not feel very pleasant to me, and either way it will stay ethically debatable.
Depop thinking - even if formally fact-based - expresses also a huge degree of negativity,
conceptual privation and potential malevolent. You mentioned in one of your books that the
per-capita consumption in our time is about 5-fold increased compared to 1950. How much
do you rate the chance of scaling down production and personal consumption and the
introduction of new sustainable technologies for halting environmental and cultural decay?
I very much doubt we will be able to scale down production and personal consumption by
more than 25% of current levels. The rest will have to come from a reduced population and
the adoption of environmentally-friendly technologies such as renewables. Carbon neutrality
is impossible without reducing the global population by at least half and without the universal
adoption of green technologies for all areas of human activity. Getting there will be
extremely painful and extraordinarily disruptive.
I beg to differ, however, that depop thinking expresses negativity. The knowledge of how and
why controlling human life on the planet is necessary and unavoidable is empowering,
illuminating, and beneficial. It is the ultimate divine knowledge and the bedrock of
civilization. I have formulated four laws of civilization building based on this divine
knowledge and these laws govern intelligent life and ensure the long-term survival of any
intelligent species anywhere in the universe. They are as follows:
1. That you have to limit the quantity of life to improve the quality and you must do it
selectively to aid and accelerate the process of natural selection and improve the
intelligence and genetic makeup of the stock.
2. That you have to slow down population growth to remain within the technical ability
of society to produce food and build infrastructure and you have to do it by any means
necessary because failing to do it will have only negative consequences.
3. That once you get close to the planet’s carrying capacity you have to stabilize the
population in perpetuity and stabilize it at a level that is sustainable for any given
planet, so the planet’s life support systems are not damaged in which case intelligent
life would unintelligently sow the seed of its own destruction.
4. That once a state of harmony is reached between civilization and nature all
subsequent progress depends on society’s ability to reduce the number of people in
direct but inverse proportion with the per capita increase in the consumption of 31
resources and that this reduction has to be accomplished with everyone’s free and
conscious collaboration. In other words, the more technologically advanced our
civilization becomes the fewer people can be accommodated on planet earth and all
people must contribute to mankind’s reduction in numbers to enable mankind’s
ascension in level of civilization.
We have reached the third law and will pass into the fourth before the end of this century. No
civilization is possible without the universal knowledge of the laws of civilization building.
I deal with this subject in my article The Role of Medicine in Population Control and
Civilization Building from the Dawn of Civilization until the Present Time.
Psychologically I also feel that overconsumption has become a substitute for the
phylogenetical basic need of familiarity or to say the primal horde which has been shrinking
to a 1-2 child nuclear family also commonly lacking the proximity of grandparents. So, there
may be also new ways of melting different families together in order to form secondary
hordes. This may mimic the primal horde, give more (pseudo) familiar support and real
sociability and reduce the risk of addiction and addictive consume behavior.
Tinkering with the nuclear family is not a good idea. Promoting a healthier extended family,
however, as was the case with previous generations, is a good idea and would certainly bring
enormous benefits especially to the oldest and the youngest members of the family.
Keeping the elderly as fit and healthy as possible should be an appropriate means of reducing
the care taking load on the young. Here we need a reshuffle of traditional caregiving concepts
by improved resource use of the elderly and promoting coexistence of mutual assistance.
Once all depopulation poisons are removed from our foods, drinks and medicines disease will
virtually disappear from our lives. So, if you want to improve the lot of the old and the
quality of life for all of us, we need only stop the global poisoning program.
A third - and crucial aspect of halting environmental collapse and bring more satisfying
relations among people and to nature - will be to create a new form of money - transcending
by far the blog-chain money to come, which only signifies more control and technical eases in
monetary transfers and expenditure. The money will have to be invented in a way which
automizes the flow of means of production towards the holistically good ideas - thus
promoting sustainability and maximal common good. Ideally it should neither allow for
cumulation nor for profit – instead it should instigate people’s creative intelligence whilst
assisting judgmental intelligence essential for sensible spending and rendering redundant any
acquiring intelligence for generating capital.
A new financial system is necessary. How it should look, I discuss in chapter 7, entitled
“Power of Money” (pp. 49-64), of my book Survival or Extinction.
What - in your opinion - would be the most likely consequences for a country to sheer out of
covert depop and making things public like you required. Is it that all participants are in 32
discussions on whether or on how to tell the truth to the public or is it a rule by implication, a
conspiracy of silence that never can be broken without severe consequences. So, what would
happen to a whistle blower who arbitrarily decided to impose open depop laws?
The President of Albania, Ilir Meta, has been trying to do just that for the past 4 years but he
is simply censored by the media which is fully controlled. He also stopped short of telling
his people how the population is controlled, which makes his efforts of dealing with his
nation’s rapid depopulation rather ineffective.
The conspiracy of silence is enforced by the fear that all heads of state and government share,
the fear of the truth. After all they are partners in crimes against humanity and genocide of a
scale and scope hitherto unknown. The truth will also expose democracy to be just a sham and
the rule of law a fiction and that would bring the entire Western world to a sudden and brutal
end. If they allow the truth to surface they will have to admit that they have committed
unspeakable crimes and will have to accept being executed for their crimes or at the very least
imprisoned for the rest of their lives. China has imposed open population control methods
with its one-child policy (from 1979 to 2015), which shows that it can be done. How it will
deal with the old-age burden once it reaches that stage of the demographic transition /
depopulation program remains to be seen. From the looks of it, it intends to use vaccines to
kill enough elderly every year, so it doesn’t come to a point where its old-age burden becomes
an obstacle to prosperity.
The only solution is for the existing world leaders to create a Planetary Wellbeing Authority,
as I have outlined in the Future of Global Governance, and to transfer global responsibility
and global enforcement powers to this newly formed institution over the three existential
issues we face: depopulation, decarbonization and globalization. Once this organization is
operational all those involved in the current genocidal system must stand in front of the world
and confess their crimes, provide full disclosure and then ask to be imprisoned for the rest of
their lives on some remote island. Among those leaders heading to prison must also be the
religious leaders involved in depop, including Pope Francis and, if still alive, Pope Benedict
XVI. That would ensure not only the restoration of the rule of law but also a smooth and
peaceful transition of power and provide a convincing demonstration of good faith on the part
of the current leaders as well as the required evidence that they can also sacrifice, for until
now they have shown only that they can impose sacrifices on the rest of us but not sacrifice
themselves. The global population will then know that depopulation, decarbonization and
globalization are an absolute necessity and that either every human being willingly makes
sacrifices or far greater sacrifices will be imposed on every human being on the planet until
our civilization reaches a state of equilibrium with nature; for failing to do so would spell the
end of mankind.
The President of Albania was censored by the main media of his own country? That sounds
pretty strange. Now the same thing happens in almost any country – from official political
side there is no heterodox approach to the manipulative mainstream version of the plandemic.
How can this form of centralized media control be exerted? It would mean that there are
people controlling the media above the law and above the governments.
It should come as no surprise that the President of Albania is censored by the media. Not after
we have witnessed what the global media and the social media giants have done to President
Trump. To what extent President Meta is censored by the Albanian media I cannot tell since I 33
don’t speak Albanian. I can only assess the level of censorship I see in the English language
articles reporting President Meta’s statements.
8. Overshoot Index, planetary boundaries, climate change and apocalypse desires
You mentioned that a good deal of UN demographic geopolitics is based on sustainability
estimates as being expressed by the so-called Overshoot Index which indicates the maximal
number of people considered to live sustainably in a certain country.
The Overshoot Index is the only official and reliable document on population numbers and all
governments are being forced (through the principle of mutual coercion mutually agreed
upon) to reach those population objectives.
That’s pretty scary- there are many countries to be set for significant depop. In how far do
governments base their decisions on these figures? The actual speeches of Merkel and von
der Leyen at WEF summit and the contradictory quarantine /testing rules on entry of a
certain country – PCR requirements only when entering via air travel - point very clearly to
the plandemic exploited for sustainability purposes.
And the speeches of EU's leaders are mirrored by Biden in the U.S. and by Xi Jinping in
China. It was obvious to me from the very beginning that the plandemic is primarily a front
for decarbonization and have stated so on hundreds of occasions. I have also published
several articles on this subject: The Pandemic Illusion and Global Governance, The G20
Virus, and Evidence the Covid-19 Pandemic is False. Until such time as we dissolve the
nation state, every country will be forced to reach a sustainable population level, as indicated
in the Overshoot Index.
Who did commission and fund the calculation of the OSI? It looks like a great deal of
uncertainty and arbitrariness in these figures since there are so many factors influencing and
many of those we do not know by now like new technologies, different modes of coexistence,
more economic forms of alimentation or water recycling to name but a few. I imagine real
politics based on them could prove to be a big hoax if not prove fatal.
The Overshoot Index calculations are provided by a British organization called Population
Matters. I’m sure its calculations are not perfect, but they are pretty good. The figures
provided by the Overshoot Index are a sober reminder just how overpopulated the world is
(currently 3 billion in overshoot) and how far some countries will have to go in order to reach
sustainability. There is no escaping the figures in the Overshoot Index because the countries
with unsustainable populations survive on the resources of other nations and on the nonrenewable resources of future generations. As such, these nations parasitize not only the
living but also the yet to be born and pose a real and present danger to the survival of
mankind. By hook or by crook their populations will be decimated until they reach
sustainability.
Some of these people (https://populationmatters.org/expert-advisory-group) have a scientific
background, the majority not. They seem to have in common the noble intentions to save the 34
world by depopulation - presumably overt rather than covert. Would be interesting to see
how they exactly calculate OSI. I doubt yet that the OSIs they calculate are by any means
valid or realistic. It looks to me like an arbitrarily created parameter, reductionist by nature
and not considering possible changes in mentality, consumption, circulation and resource
use. To use such unsolid figures for direct far reaching geopolitical steps implicating
hardship and suffering to the many seems ludicrous to me.
You miss the point. Their calculations are based on current consumption and resources. It's
the only way to be accurate, which is why they revise their calculations every few
years. They cannot base their calculations on what could be. The Overshoot index is the most
reliable data there is to date.
Yet the future has hardly ever been a continuation of the past and you cannot say nowadays
what will be OSI like in 30 years - no?
Pursuing geopolitical objectives even with imperfect data is far better than doing nothing.
Doing nothing leads to certain collapse and to universal suffering. They are trying to get
ahead of the demographic and environmental curves. And to succeed they are willing to
sacrifice as many as it takes.
All but themselves...
Yes, they are very good at imposing sacrifices and not so good at sacrificing themselves.
But the crux of the problem is that they think people are incapable of governing themselves
and need a strong hand to control them.
I shattered their worldview that we, the common people, are incapable of governing ourselves
and of understanding the existential issues mankind faces, which is why they fear, hate and
respect me at the same time.
Maybe they are suffering a common form of apocalypse desire / fear as many people did for
millenniums.
Those who want the apocalypse do nothing. Those who try to prevent the apocalypse do
whatever they can.
In a psychoanalytical view the objects you create (here apocalypse) originate from a
principal desire. Maybe the hysterical doomsday scenarios of climate-, carbon-, pandemicand population- panickers makes them think and act in apocalyptic categories weighed
against each other. This may disconnect them from reality and puts everyone under enormous
pressure for change. Apocalypse - avoidance mode probably never lead to adequate
decisions.
No, their desire to prevent the apocalypse, by which I mean the collapse of our civilization, is
genuine and is based on the most accurate figures to date. As our knowledge advances and as
our technology progresses we will be able to increase the sustainability threshold, in other 35
words the number of people who can live on planet earth without damaging its life support
systems.
The problem is not the figures or the analysis or the objectives. The problem is the methods
by which those figures, analysis and objectives are being pursued.
So, you think they are truly convinced on the impact of global warming or are they using it as
a pretext for covert depopulation measures?
Yes, they are convinced. Besides, global warming is as real as you and I.
The warming is real, but is the estimate of the impact on human survival correct or is it
projection?
No one can predict the future with any accuracy. But when the system says we project this or
that then you can bet that projection will become reality because the word projection in the
system’s language means objective.
Furthermore, global warming/climate change is just one of the planetary boundaries we
endanger. There are eight more: biodiversity loss, biogeochemical overload (including
nitrogen cycle), ocean acidification, land overuse, freshwater depletion, ozone depletion,
atmospheric aerosols overload, and chemical pollution. Latest scientific evidence shows that
we have already exceeded three of those nine planetary boundaries identified by scientists:
climate change, biodiversity loss, and the nitrogen cycle.
To prevent catastrophic consequences by tipping these nine planetary boundaries into a
different and unpropitious state, we need to not only depopulate but also decarbonize, that is,
reduce our greenhouse gas emissions to almost zero.
My major point of skepticism comes from the fact that in the CV19-, Decarb/Depop- and
what’s to follow agenda they miss an essential crucial principle of your book: Truth for Trust.
They miss all three fundamental principles I identify as crucial, as well as the proper
institutional architecture to pursue the goals we must reach. I describe the Truth for Trust
Principle as follows in The Future of Global Governance.
“If the Sustainable Development Goals are to succeed, a new entity made up of
trustworthy, deserving and untainted individuals, which shall be called the Council of
12, must be created and placed atop the UN system to ensure that henceforth all actions
emanating from the global governance level are not only in good faith but also fully
transparent and wholly and immediately communicated to the public at large, thus
bringing to an end the era of dishonesty, deception, shameless elitism and backroom
dealing that characterize the modus operandi of the current international community.
The openness and truthfulness of this new superstructure of policy makers, henceforth
called the Truth for Trust Principle, will earn back the public’s trust and restore
decency and the rule of law to global governance. This will allow the Council of 12 to
represent a new beginning, without dissolving the existing international structure, other
than the Security Council, whose powers and duties it will inherit, and to serve as the 36
brain of the world in order to coordinate the global effort demanded by the Sustainable
Development Goals and do it with grace, compassion and dignity, yet as resolutely as a
force of nature to compel humanity to act as one, fully-formed and intelligent organism.
As it is, humanity is like a chicken without a head, fluttering its wings in utter
desperation and jumping hither and tither, exhausting itself in the process, breaking
everything in its path, and making no headway whatsoever.”
…a principle that the commoners yet have to demand.
The commoners are fifty years behind in their knowledge of geopolitics and two thousand
years behind in their knowledge of population control. They have a lot of catching up to do.
9. The role of Russia – GDPP / Decarb – Democratic fiber - Cold War
As we talked about already, Russia’s economy depends very much on oil/ gas exports. They
are therefore in a natural antagonism toward the decarb strategy of the EU, Biden’s US and
China’s new green deal. So, I would expect to be some friction here. Since the pandemic
presumably was designed to decarbonate and to depopulate (a.o.) how would you rate
Russia’s role in that plot? They developed a vaccine, they were confining people, they weren't
as resistant as Belarus which faced severe sanctions from UNO, World Bank and media. To
your estimate does Russia also comply with the CV-19 agenda because of mutual coercion
concerning depop, whereas global decarb negatively impacts their export industry - i.e. that
would mean that vital economic self-interest is submitted to global depop obligations?
Russia is fully onboard the depopulation agenda, especially since its median age is 40.2 (and
if we are to subtract the much younger populations of its far eastern provinces we are left with
a median age of almost 50 in white Russia) and as such has among the oldest populations in
the world but refuses to cooperate with the decarbonization agenda because 70% of its
revenue comes from the sale of fossil fuels.
Russia in fact has been a driving force of the Global Depopulation Program and has attained
its objectives ahead of the West forcing the US to keep pace with it, as I have shown in my
article How the Russians Do It.
Russia is collaborating in the plandemic because it needs to get rid of its old people and what
better way to do it than with vaccines. It tried to raise the retirement age a couple of years
ago, but the backlash was so great that Putin had to back down.
Do you have any ideas on how this conflict of interest between Russia and the Decarb-Powers
could be ameliorated? Or is it that decarb is exploited strategically as a pretext to weaken
Russia?
No, decarbonization is not used as a pretext to weaken Russia, at least not by the EU. But
Russia is so dependent on fossil fuels, and its population is so old, that its economy cannot be
modernized in the short time dictated by the decarbonization effort. 37
The German government has softened this conflict of interest by reassuring Russia that it will
continue to buy its gas, which is why the two nations have gone ahead on the Nord Stream 2
gas pipe line. The best long-term solution is to enable Russia to sell its oil and gas to
developing nations while developed nations switch to renewables. In this fashion the markets
it loses in the West are compensated for by newly gained markets elsewhere in the world.
But their fossil fuels sold to developing countries will be burned either way and exacerbate
global warming.
A legally enforceable annual reduction of gas sales could be implemented to give Russia the
time it needs to refocus its economy while at the same time gradually take the world to a
fossil fuel free state. At the same time, Russia should be encouraged to become part of the
EU so it can become a full-fledged member by 2030. Its market integration with the EU
would allow Russia to prosper despite decarbonization and would mean enduring peace in
Europe.
Inclusion of the Russian Federation into the EU would allow the EU to save 50 million of its
people since Russia has the resources to support an additional 50 million on top of the 120
million people it has. Provided, of course, that the sustainable population of the EU is
counted for the entire territory and not for every country. The EU needs the vast resources of
Russia and Russia needs the EU's manufacturing and scientific knowhow as well as its
capital. Together, they would comprise by far the most powerful entity in the world.
Without doubt- it would be a huge geopolitical and economic shift which might even
compromise the hegemony of the US and also weakening the impact of China if we think in a
conventional antagonistic, competitive power-matrix. The question is whether the actual
superpowers China and the US would consent a game-changing step like this. Ideally these
old rivalries should be settled for the sake of a sustainable and safer world for all with
democratic structures uncompromised and no secrecy between governments and people.
Neither the US nor China would have a say in this. The EU is too powerful economically and
Russia is too powerful militarily. If the EU and Russia agree to merge no one could stop
them. The problem is not that others may resent this. The problem is that Russia lacks any
and all democratic fiber. But that too will be solved once Putin is gone. Or, if President Putin
is truly intelligent, he could pave the way for a democratic Russia by treating Alexey Navalny
with the respect he deserves. If Putin truly loves Russia and the Russian people then he will
take my advice to heart and act upon it.
Remains to be seen who’s going to succeed him. In terms of autocratic fiber, we may be level
soon with Russia. All the western governments now seem to infringe on their democratic
principles for the sake of population control, sustainability and decarb. In western European
countries like in the Anglo-Saxon sphere the remains of democracy (albeit already damaged
by covert depop) have been powerfully damped down. This would facilitate the formation of a
well-adjusted worldwide tyranny rather than nourish the buds of Russian democracy to
germinate. In Buddhism there exists no way to happiness, yet happiness is the way - to say the
way we are brought to sustainable population figures isn’t all but a respectful and happy one.
Since the enforcement mechanisms appear to be protracted confusion, fear, social schism and
brute force, why should we expect this to be changed by the same international elites, who are 38
already well aligned and who are installing worldwide a terribly arrogant and restrictive
system in front of our eyes in mutual accordance, coercion and support.
Once we show the world that the depopulation and decarbonization prerogatives are behind
the loss of democracy and the rule of law we can shatter the system's secrecy and legitimacy
therefore returning the world to justice and equity.
The elites will change because we will force them. We will give them two choices: provide
full disclosure, give up power peacefully and spend the rest of your lives in prison or be
burned at the stake by the mob and have your entire genetic lineages erased from the face of
the earth. They will choose the first option to save their offspring.
Once you stated the Cold War narrative was mainly kept up for depop purposes to mutually
distract from the actual aggressor against the people (= their own governments). Is the
capitalism-communism antagonism a consciously induced dichotomy between two
materialistic thought systems at its core?
Yes, the Cold War was just a front for sustaining the fear so as to justify funding the militaryindustrial complex and giving it a free hand to pursue the needed depopulation objectives.
This becomes self-evident when one looks at the nearly identical population curves of Russia
and the US. My article How the Russians Do It provides this evidence.
So, with a step from covert to overt depop we could render any manufactured international
rivalry superfluous and the billions spent on pointless arsenals could be spent for the
technological sustainability transition. But here we touch very powerful economic and
military – in fact egotistical and narcissistic - interests who have been allowed to flourish on
the fertile soil of inflicted fear.
Yes, by bringing the GDPP out in the open we render the entire military-industrial complex
obsolete and the extraordinary wealth freed would enable us to transition to renewables in no
time at all. Once we show the world that the depopulation and decarbonization prerogatives
are behind the loss of democracy and the rule of law we can shatter the system's secrecy and
legitimacy therefore returning the world to justice and equity.
It looks very much like everyone in this world has to develop his democratic consciousness
and people have to demand their participation. Principally it’s up to the people to
emancipate and take charge and it has been their neglect to do so which has made the elites
what they are. The problem we face now is that the people do not dispose of any military
power...
The people need only to rise. The military will come to our side in no time at all because they
are being manipulated and controlled like the rest of us.
Let’s hope so. But do we have another option?39
Yes. Pray that the elites will transfer power peacefully as I have asked them to do. If they
indeed have the best interests of mankind at heart and not their own then they will do just that.
If not then we will know they are dishonest.
10. Assisted suicide
If one day you were rewarded with a governing function of the Planetary Wellbeing Authority
you have envisioned, what were the first changes you mandated?
I would mandate a global Population Stabilization Law with three objectives: replacement
level fertility until we become an interplanetary species, assisted suicide until we reach a
stable population structure, and optimal population levels per country so long as the nation
state exists.
What do you think would be their motives to put exactly you on top? As a gift that you brought
to light their crimes of the present & past? Or revealing their plans?
Because I am the only one capable of taking on and carrying out this seemingly impossible
task.
I don’t insist on being in control, but I see no one willing or capable of assuming this
awesome burden. I shattered the walls of secrecy and deception that have kept the current
system going and I now have no choice but to show the way forward. I also am the only
person to have provided an alternative to the current methods, therefore, who better to see to it
that we all play by a different set of rules and succeed in being the first generation to assume
planetary responsibilities. I have made the most sacrifices to ensure that the truth prevails and
as such have proved that I am the only genuine leader and the first geopolitical leader in our
long and tortuous history.
If somebody else matches or exceeds my accomplishments, and is willing and able to assume
control, I will gladly retire and spend the rest of my days gardening. But I see no one else
because there is no one else.
As Emerson once said, “an institution is the lengthened shadow of one man”. The Planetary
Wellbeing Authority is my shadow. Anyone else at its helm would be standing in my shadow
and would only be an impostor.
To give you an idea of the titanic struggle I have carried out against the system, I urge you to
read my New Year’s Message to World Leaders, which chronicles my sacrifices and
accomplishments only until the end of 2016. I haven’t yet had the chance to list what I have
done since 2016.
I expect this to be quite a task indeed. Did you ever face the challenges of a political position
with all the diplomacy and intrigues involved?
This will not be a political position but an existential burden without equal. So far only the
popes have carried this burden. I would be the first secular person to carry this burden and 40
the first human being period to do so openly, a truly unenviable position. I don't want this
position, but I wouldn't trust anyone else with it.
Whom would you offer suicide assistance? Would it be mandatory until OSI is reached?
Assisted suicide would need to be mandatory only if people refuse to understand its necessity
and do not willingly end their lives for the sake of their children, their children's children and
all future generations. But I am certain people will understand. What I fear is that too many
will decide to die prematurely.
In Switzerland we have an organization called Exit which provides suicide assistance services
- its popular and we have quite some suicide tourists. Once I was asked to assist to a patient
of my colleague and I refused. It would have implied a home visit, preparing the barbiturate
drink, leaving patient alone to drink it and return 30 min later confirming his death and
sending the bill to the insurance company. Just didn’t feel ready to do this honestly.
I don't blame you.
Thanks.
Imagine what the popes have felt like when they decided to start a culling of the flock and in
so doing have condemned millions to death! Imagine what Pope Francis feels like now that
he has approved the depopulation by vaccination program!
What may Heinrich Himmler have felt like after the Wannsee conference? They may have felt
important saviors of the world deciding the evil to achieve the greater goal - the Endlösung.
Culling of the flock is probably even more satisfying than the Endlösung, because it doesn’t
mark the end. You can always repeat it and feel even more important each time.
It would be a horrible burden and no human being on the planet would find any gratification
in it. Himmler, like Hitler, had no clue what they were doing, which is why they lasted only a
short period. The Church, by comparison, has committed the gravest crimes in history but is
still strong because it knows that its crimes are for the highest end, that of doing God's work
where God's power ends....and man's recklessness begins.
I think psychopaths and narcissists will find gratification - and there are quite a few around.
Psychopaths and narcissists could not do this terrifying work because they lack empathy and a
social conscience not to mention the support of faith.
So you would consider yourself an “Übermensch” in the best Nietzschean sense?
I am destined for this and have been baptized by fire to be the first secular person to assume
command and control from spiritual leaders over the sacred task of controlling human life on
the planet. I am not an Übermensch. I am merely a son of man. 41
In an earlier conversation you made two contradictory statements: 1. “The commons are like
infants. They have no clue what world they live in and what it takes to keep the human ship
afloat” 2. “I shattered their worldview that we, the common people, are incapable of
governing ourselves and of understanding the existential issues mankind faces” Are the
commons now infants or rather capable of self-government?
If I could come to this knowledge and understanding on my own and despite the mighty walls
erected to prevent us all from tasting this forbidden fruit then so can everyone else once this
knowledge is served on a platter to each and all.
The current state of ignorance is the result of secrecy and deception, thus the result of the
monopolization of this knowledge. Once the floodgates of knowledge are opened to each and
all this knowledge will become universal and the children will become adults.
So, changing the power structure to self-government would imply a gradual educational
process of the commoners which you and a few others have already started. But system
protective mainstream may discount your work as conspiracies and teaching the commoners
the truth on demographics could result in chaos and violence hence they will only understand
parts of the truth which may evoke anger and rage.
Yes, educating the masses is essential and this process is already underway. My work cannot
be touched by the last remaining strategy the system uses to protect its secrets. My work
speaks for itself and stands on its own. Sure there will be anger and rage, as it should be, but
they will subside. The chaos and the violence can be limited if the current leadership
transfers control of the world to a Planetary Wellbeing Authority which is untainted and can
start with a clean slate.
They may get stuck half way with emancipation and not to proceed to determination and
organization.
Chaos and violence will be short-lived simply because no one likes them or can live in
them. People want and need order, peace, certainty, clarity and purpose.
Exactly, and neither you nor me nor anybody else could provide this in a complex political
world in such short time. So, would you agree that the intellectual elites would have to better
organize as well to be prepared for a takeover after system collapse.
Which is why I am telling the existing power structure to pave the way to a peaceful transition
of power and then step aside. The system cannot be allowed to collapse. It must be allowed to
morph. The power transfer cannot happen unless there is a new institution, the Planetary
Wellbeing Authority ready to take control.
Ideally yes – agreed. Maybe they are on that path already but cannot see any responsible
entity on which to pass on power.42
There is indeed no responsible entity yet, which is why I say the Planetary Wellbeing
Authority must be created.
Implicating the UN Security Council members already in office?
Its creation must be the act of all nation states not just those represented in the UN Security
Council. It must also be the act of all living religions.
This is very idealistic.
I believe both secular and spiritual leaders will be more than happy to unburden themselves of
this. They will consider themselves saved from hell.
But do you reckon it to be feasible?
Yes, it is certainly feasible, and it can only succeed if all nations and all religions birth this
entity together. This would make it unprecedented and would have a shock and awe effect on
every human being on the planet, just the kind of jolt we need to make the leap to a higher
civilization.
That would represent yet another central authority which may not be very popular amongst
the commoners who just started to get rid of their tyranny. Maybe people will become strict
regionalist - aiming for a self-sufficient live in smaller communities not corrupted by any
higher governing body. They may have become deceived and skeptical to power in general.
The world is too small and the population too large for self-sufficient communities
uncorrupted by a higher governing body. Besides, no one would want to be a prisoner of a
commune when the Planetary Wellbeing Authority offers the world to each and all of us.
Power exercised openly and without lies for the benefit of all is something the world has
never seen before. The mere existence of such an entity would dissolve all doubts. If we
build it they will come. They will come to it like ducks to water.
Just coming back to our focal issue: Assisted suicide at the age 75 years either consensual
or, if needed, mandatory in the coming 2 generations to overcome the growing ageing crisis.
A drastic and debatable measure like this definitely remains ethically charged and will surely
be met with public condemnation. The mandatory nature does not clearly discriminate it from
murder and a system requiring this is not necessarily more humane than the envisaged
upgrade to the clandestine GDPP phasing in plandemics and vaccines for more targeted
depop. Your serious advocacy for suicide to be mandated by a wellbeing authority as a
humane alternative to the present management of depop seems to speak volumes of the extent
of the atrocities committed by the GDPP until now. On asking myself what sort of life
termination to prefer - timely killer-vax shot, worn down psychologically, chemically,
hormonally and infection-wise versus forced suicide - I honestly wouldn’t go for either by my
own choice - probably like most people.
Ending our lives at age 75 for the next two generations, or until the population structure
stabilizes, with an injection that stops the heart painlessly while surrounded by those who love
us is a far better way to go then dying alone in a sterile hospital bed of cancer after years of
chronic illness caused by covert methods of depopulation. And let’s not forget that the 43
generations alive today are the first in history not to experience war, or to be forcibly drafted
into armies, because of the program of depopulation. Our refusal to do our part so we can
complete this program peacefully would condemn our children to poverty and ultimately to
war and will force those who govern us to become mass murderers and all of us to commit
patricide and matricide. It would erase all the sacrifices made so far and all those who have
been sacrificed thus far.
Wouldn’t it be easier to cut the access of the elderly to hospital or medical care from a
defined age onward? This - as cruel as it looks - seems less problematic than mandatory
assisted suicide. It would be the simplest and most causal sanction since modern medicine is
one of the key factors of people growing older than they should for demographic reasons. For
instance, the British NHS limits accessibility to dialysis services in about two thirds of
patients over 70. And in Switzerland hospital capacities were continuously reduced in the last
20 years despite the older population (>65 years) was growing some 50%.
That may be easier politically, but it would cause even more human suffering than assisted
suicide at age 75, as this would result in years of illness unmitigated by drugs and palliative
care. And this suffering would be physical and debilitating not only to the elderly themselves
but also, to their children who would be left to care for them, which would be an even greater
financial and emotional drag on the younger generations. The cost of dying slowly would fall
on the children whereas now it falls on the government. Imagine millions of elderly decaying
slowly and in great pain versus a clean and civilized planned death at 75.
By the way, denying the old and the chronically ill access to care is what is happening now
under the guise of covid-19 and the false pretense that hospitals are overwhelmed by patients
infected with covid-19.
This, unfortunately, is very true.
As it looks to me, many people would still prefer the suffering to suicide. On the other hand, it
would stimulate people to live a healthier life which allowed them to live longer when they
are self-sufficient and/or socially well organized. Drugs could be provided since they do not
impose much economic burden if prices are not artificially raised and a good many of them
are rather shortening life spans and would be in favor of the depop lobby. Palliative care for
limited time frames should be feasible too. I had in mind rather intensive care and hospital
access from certain age limits on although I have to admit that some cold shivers running
down my back on that thought.
If governments can convince people of the need to limit lifespans by making intensive care
and hospital access illegal after a certain age, then it can just as well convince people to end
their lives at age 75, especially once the extraordinary benefits of an open population control
program are explained. Last but not least, making intensive care and hospital access illegal
after a certain age would result in a two-tier system whereby the poor are left to die on their
own while the rich can hire their own doctors and buy their own medical machines to extend
their lives as much as possible. And such an unfair system would inevitably lead to war.
Agreed on the issue with a two-tier system which already exists in most countries without
implicating civil war. If it openly came down to feast or famine in terms of survival it would
definitely supercharge preexisting social differences and tensions. 44
If we don’t muster the strength to face our death with dignity for the sake of our children, then
our children will be forced to muster the strength to commit matricide and patricide. The
choice is clear.
Furthermore, it is impossible to live a healthy life when you are bombarded daily with
hundreds of endocrine disruptors / depopulation poisons through the basic elements of life
and then forced to inject gene altering and immunity destroying vaccines. That is a pipe
dream. The only way to return to a poison free life is to bring the depopulation program out in
the open and the only way to do this is if people agree to first limit their family size to two
children only from now until the end of time and, secondly, limit their own lives to 75 years
when a country reaches the last stage of the demographic transition / depopulation program
and has to deal with inverted population pyramids, thus with too many old people to support
and too few young people to pay the costs of this heavy old-age burden.
So, you envisage premature life termination if necessitated by exceeding the Overshoot Index
would have to be mandatory in the new concept? Assisted suicide would replace immune
disruption, provoked collapse of health systems and depopulation by vaccination. Assisted
suicide would be conscious, transparent, mutually coerced and agreed upon instead of hidden
depop but it may have to be mandatory if people are refusing it.
Assisted suicide at a predetermined age of 75 until the population stabilizes at a sustainable
level, thus for two generations, is dictated by the inverted population pyramids we now have
due to seven decades of war on fertility. Absent this the nations that have reached the last
stage of the demographic transition / depopulation program will collapse under the weight of
their old-age burdens. As the developing world reaches the last stage of the demographic
transition it too will have to adopt assisted suicide at age 75. This is a sacrifice we must
make for our children’s children and for those who come after them. Considering that we are
the first generations in history not to experience war and that we have been spared the horrors
of war because of the program of population control, terminating our lives at age 75 is a
reasonable sacrifice. If we don’t make this sacrifice, we will condemn our children and
children’s children to lives of poverty and possibly to war.
We have reaped the benefits of a covert program of population control, now we must give
back so that those who come after us reap the benefits of our actions and the demographic
transition / depopulation program can be accomplished peacefully and in a civilized and
humane manner. The dividends of an open program of population control that empowers
every human being on the planet to make sacrifices will be extraordinary and
immeasurable. For one thing, the vast sums of money now expanded on the militaryindustrial complex, whose sole reason for existence is to wage a secret war on fertility and
immunity, thus on us the civilian population, will be freed and used for us and by us rather
than against us by a few genocidal elites, as is currently the case. It will also lead to the
elimination of all nuclear weapons since nuclear deterrence will become obsolete, nuclear
deterrence being the obverse side of population control. This will free at least 25% of global
GDP and will remove the brakes to our prosperity leading to a standard of living and a quality
of life that we can scarce imagine, as well as ensuring global peace and eliminating the threat
of nuclear annihilation once and for all.
Secondly, it will make possible the cessation of all covert chemical and biological methods of
depopulation currently in place, methods that make us sick, lower our quality of life, and have
devolved us genetically and intellectually, as they are responsible for the epidemic of chronic 45
diseases that kill 80% of us and affect us all. That means that the 75 years we will live will be
disease free and in the best of health.
Thirdly, the rule of law and all our rights and liberties will be restored, as they will no longer
be undermined by the depopulation prerogative pursued by secrecy and deception. This will
ensure an unprecedented level of personal freedom and individual dignity, as well as the
liberation of the media, government and education from the putrid and suffocating lies of an
elite bent on genocide and absolute control over every aspect of our lives. It will be the last
nail in the coffin of the hellish and perverted New World Order the criminals in charge intend
for us. Instead we will have a New Axial Age lit by our enlightenment.
Luckily, the need to limit lifespans is necessary only for two to three generations, thus until
the inverted population pyramids become bullet shaped population pyramids, thus until the
population structure is stable, at which point the need to limit lifespans would cease and
people can be allowed to live to the end of their natural lives and without being subjected to
covert chemical and biological depopulation poisons, as is currently the case.
I just can’t see the people now bravely demonstrating and fighting for their basic human
rights coming to terms with any system with planed life termination - be it covert or overt.
They would jump out from the (hidden) frying pan into the (open) fire. I think however that
the holy grails of the limits of our life span, birth and death and the frightening unknown
nature of our existence before and after theses boundaries should no longer be exploited by
clerical or secular institutions, it should no longer be used as an instrument of power and
power abuse. There is to my mind a strong need of broader public reflection about death and
dying which still seemed to be blocked out socio-culturally. Instead of a pejorative and fear
inflicting concept of death exploited for maintaining hierarchic power structures death should
be a) accepted, b) freed from taboos and c) celebrated. Children should be already made
familiar within a rational manner with the difficulties of dying and death. Strategies to
overcome fear of loss and mental techniques of mourning should be developed and taught
instead of instigating fear and perpetuating an oppressive, divisive system of avoidance of the
masses and delusionary “knowing” of the high priests and their executive organs of our
times.
It is precisely because of this refusal to stare death in the face that we have the system we
have. And so long as good people like you refuse to stare death in the face we will continue to
have the system we have, for this reluctance gives the elites the justification to continue to
control human life on the planet and to sacrifice as many as it takes when they deem it
necessary.
To my experience as a doctor – the vast majority of people being assertive to stare death in
the face whist still in a state of decent health are pretty reluctant dyers when the hour strikes.
Many elderlies at 75 are still very active, enjoy a rich social life and will see no reason to
prematurely terminate their worldly existence. When even you - as a major critic of the GDPP
- suggested assisted suicide as an inevitable prerequisite for achieving sustainability goals - it
might serve as an excuse also for the GDPP to evade accountability and legal action?
Any sober assessment of the facts and analysis of the possible courses of action comes to the
same conclusion, namely that sustainability is impossible without depopulation. As such, the
system does not need my endorsement. My endorsement may have come in handy to those 46
inside the system, however, by giving them an additional and powerful argument to convince
the various undecided heads of state and government that were still reluctant to get onboard
the depopulation train, that even a fully independent common citizen with no political
affiliation or financial interests arrived at the same logical, reasonable and inevitable
conclusion as the system itself.
But at the very best they may just use you as an argument for continuation of covert depop
and will not accept the necessity for full disclosure.
My very existence, the full weight of my work in geopolitics and the many public actions I
have taken and the sacrifices I have endured invalidate their covert program of depopulation.
11. The role of China
Having said this, there is a way to avoid mandatory assisted suicide at a predetermined age.
But you won’t like it and it is fraught with risks: The developing world, where the population
is still growing and is young, can support the developed world during the last stage of the
demographic transition, basically funding our retirement. This is in a sense already
happening, which is why all western nations are heavily indebted to China and the Gulf
nations. And once the developed world reaches sustainability, we can support them survive
their last stage of the demographic transition by funding their retirement.
This strategy, however, implies global political stability and perfect international cooperation
for the next 90 years. During the first wave China and the Gulf nations fund the retirement of
Western nations from 2020 to 2050. During the second wave Western nations fund the
retirement of the people of China and the Gulf nations from 2050 to 2080. And during the
third wave Western nations together with China and the Gulf nations fund the retirement of
India and Africa from 2080 to 2110.
Provided the environment does not collapse from under our feet this plan may work. This
plan, however, implies also that every human being on the planet accepts being poor until the
beginning of the 22nd century for the sake of supporting an ever-expanding population of old
people over the course of an ever-expanding lifespan. We will sacrifice our youth to extend
our misery in old age.
Furthermore, this plan will rob us all of the three major dividends of an open population
control program I described above and will condemn us to a century of global totalitarianism.
Do you mean that the western nations are indebted to China because they fund primarily our
retirement (and not so much overconsumption of all of us?). Or is it that westerners have to
employ care takers from developing countries and these are paid by money loaned from
China?
We are indebted to China because it buys our debt, which our governments accrue to cover
the burgeoning costs of retirement and the even higher medical costs of the retired. I am sure
you are aware that 80% of the medical expenditures per capita occur in the last ten years of
life. The costs of caretakers from developing nations are minimal and are not borne by47
governments but by individuals, as such they have no bearing on political decisions or
national budgets.
On the course of the plandemic – presumably due to its deceiving nature - we saw the
emergence of quite some geopolitical speculation about the true background. One of these
theories assumes the plandemic to be created to force western societies dumping their
economy so that Chinese (and other international) companies can buy them on the cheap as a
geopolitically sanctioned compensation for all the credits they are holding. The US may allow
China to do this for paying China back America’s debts? This way both countries may well
exploit their hegemonies and military advantages? Do you think there could be something to
this?
No, that is certainly not the case. China buying western companies is the result of large capital
accumulations resulting from their growing economy, which in turn is the result of Western
capital seeking new markets to compensate for the decreasing markets back home. It is in
other words the result of capital going where capital holders can reap the greatest benefits due
to low production and labor costs and expanding consumer numbers while their home markets
are shrinking. Countries with decreasing populations grow poorer because their markets are
shrinking along with their populations while countries with increasing populations grow
richer because their markets are growing along with their increasing populations.
Furthermore, the younger the population is the greater the consumption and vice versa the
older the population the lower the consumption. The West has been able to mask this, and to
stay afloat, by reaping financial benefits from the markets of the developing world. China
began to boom in the 1980s when the West’s population flattened, and governments allowed
pension funds to invest abroad in order to be able to continue growing so as to keep up with a
continuously growing old-age burden. That is how the Chinese and Western economies
became entangled and interdependent. As a result, China became the world’s factory and, in
due time, the buyer of Western government debt too. This also explains why there are such
huge and growing trade deficits between China and the West. The countries with the highest
pension fund assets – US, UK, Australia, Netherlands, Canada and Japan – are as a result also
the most dependent on China because China props up their national debts.
China currently is the biggest creditor of western countries which will never be able to meet
their financial obligations to China. In how far will China use this position of financial
power? Apart from having such a successful economy they may boast the only successful DPP
so far set aside the cruelty against their women. Will they say - you effeminate romantic
Westerners may hold up human rights and democratic tradition, but our societies will prevail
due to our discipline, submission to the greater good, strict reasoning, collective spirit and
lack of scruple? Since it is you who owe us, we will - bearing an alternative - remit your debt
as part of a great reset. In return we will set the tone from now on not only economically but
also in terms of ethics, politics and populational control of numbers and distribution? In how
far could China reinforce such a geopolitical ascent be it militarily or due to its financial
levers?
China poses no such threat, nor has such ambitions. China merely wants to coexist peacefully
with the rest of the world and to prosper. China cannot and does not want to have a position of
preeminence and leadership because the Chinese know it is not within their nature to be
dominant and to impose their will on other nations. The following characteristics show this. 48
First, the Chinese suffer from an inferiority complex vis-à-vis westerners. Second, China has
a history of non-aggression. Third, the Chines have been socially selected to be obedient and
submissive and as such lack the fundamental prerequisites of global leadership let alone
conquest. Fourth, China has an impenetrable culture and an impossible language which
makes their culture non-transferrable.
China however needs and wants access to resources, which is why it has embarked on the
largest global infrastructure project in history, the Belt and Road Initiative. By laying a debt
trap to poor world governments China will ensure it gets access to the resources it needs.
How it will collect on its debts remains to be seen, but I suspect that debts will become
irrelevant once we live in a borderless world and use a global digital currency.
In ancient times China may well have hidden behind it’s long walls and there might be an
element of non-aggression in the Confucianist Chinese mentality - they seem to refrain from
open domination in foreign affairs. How would you rate the Annexation of Tibet and the
suppression of Tibetan culture and People, the interventions in Cambodia, North Vietnam, the
border conflicts with India, the oppression in Hong Kong, conflicts with Taiwan, aggressive
economic expansion to most African countries? Set aside severe human rights infringements
against their own people – the Tian’anmen massacre, systematic involuntary organ harvest,
violent oppression of opposition and dissidents, terrors of Mao’s culture revolution to name a
few indicators of autocratic rule.
History shows that Tibet became a part of China 800 years ago during the Yuan Dynasty and
that Tibet has never been an independent country. It has governed itself as an autonomous
region at various times in history but it was either under Mongol, Chinese or British control.
The interventions in Cambodia, Vietnam and the border conflicts with India were motivated
not by desires for territorial expansion but to secure its own borders and the stability of the
region.
Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan were always a part of China but separated due to either
British aggression, as in the case of Hong Kong, Portuguese aggression, as in the case of
Macao, and Dutch aggression, as in the case of Taiwan. Taiwan was lost first to the Dutch,
then to the Japanese and finally to the nationalist government of the Republic of China
(ROC), led by Kuomintang, when it fled there after losing control of mainland China in the
Chinese Civil War.
The economic expansion in Africa happens by mutual agreement and for mutual benefit and
can in no way, shape or form be misconstrued as aggression. It is motivated merely by the
need for vital natural resources and access to them. China, however, pays for them and does
not take them by force.
When it comes to the brutality the government shows its own people that is another matter.
And that is also China’s Achilles heel and why its culture and system are not transferrable
elsewhere in the world. The Chinese will say that this is the only way to keep together a
country as big, varied and poor as China and they may well be right, although I beg to differ.
You forgot to mention the plight of the Uighurs and the forced labor camps they are being
held in by the millions. This repression is the result of China’s strict population control
measures, which the government could not impose on its ethnic groups, as it did on the Han 49
Chinese population through the one child policy (1979-2015). As a result, the ethnic
proportion grew in relation to the Han Chinese population and this is what the Chinese
government is trying to rectify now. The West will not say that the Uighurs are being
sterilized in those camps, but that is exactly what is happening and the only reason why they
are being held there.
Be that as it may, China has never invaded another nation-state and never will.
12. The system’s next steps
In one of your latest posts “What the system is cooking” you outlined the system’s next steps
of controlling population and preventing climate collapse. You predict so called cataclysms
(catastrophic natural events like bush fires or methane clouds from melting permafrost
surfaces) manmade (mantaclysms) from 2040 to 2060 to force through mankind’s
complacency to UN plans of saving the world.
From 2000 to 2020 the system has played the terrorism card to subject the Islamic world to
the same population control methods as the Christian world. To this end it has invented the
boogeyman of Islamic terrorism.
From 2020 to 2040 the system will play the pandemic card to bring fertility rates in the
developing world below replacement level, thus below 2 children per woman, and the old-age
burden in developed nations below 20%, as well as to lower greenhouse gas emissions by
10% globally every year until 2030, as required by the Paris Climate Accord. To this end, it
has invented a series of pandemics and the boogeyman of killer viruses and will continue to
do so.
And from 2040 to 2060 the system will play the cataclysm card to complete the depopulation
program worldwide, stabilize the climate, force 90% of the global population into the cities,
and restore 50% of the planet's surface back to nature. To this end, it will cause a series of
cataclysms, more accurately called mantaclysms since they will be entirely man-made and
blame it on the boogeyman global warming. They will range from fires, tsunamis,
earthquakes, methane clouds and volcanic eruptions to floods, droughts, hurricanes and
meteorites.
Each method - be it terrorism, plandemics or mantaclysms - has been or will have been ten
years in the making, which is why the terrorism and plandemic periods have intersected from
2010 to 2020, and why the plandemics and mantaclysms periods will intersect from 2030 to
2040.
As it looks, the threat of overpopulation and climate collapse does justify quite some
controversial means. For instance, Bill Gates has funded many innovative projects to halt
global warming and reduce greenhouse emissions. Among those there were more radical
approaches of so-called solar geoengineering meaning to mimic the effects of a giant
volcanic eruption thousands of planes would fly at high altitudes, spraying millions of tons of
particles around the planet to create a massive chemical cloud that would cool the surface by
reflecting sunlight in the stratosphere. Gates has, through personal funding and investments,
been one of the major backers of solar geoengineering research for more than a decade 50
although the manifold unpredictable risks of this approach cannot be overlooked: extreme
shifts in weather patterns similar to warming trends we are already witnessing to further
destabilize global climate and eco-systems, droughts and floods in Africa and South America,
land grabs, ocean acidification, pollution, continental crop failures and famines. A dramatic
shift in mitigation strategy could be treated as green light to continue emitting greenhouse
gases with little to no changes in current consumption and production patterns. Widespread
research into the efficacy of solar geoengineering has been stalled for years due to
controversy.
Recently, the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), set to start in
June 2021, was launched by Harvard University scientists to explore the use of spraying nontoxic calcium carbonate (CaCO3) dust into the atmosphere in offsetting the effects of global
warming by reflecting sunlight.
They've been doing this for 10 years. Now they are just bringing it out in the open. Those
readers who want to know more about this subject can watch my three short videos: What do
we know about Chemtrails, Understanding Chemtrails, and Why are Chemtrails Denied.
Because it’s only “harmless” CaCO3 rather than sterilizing, mitochondrial blocking
aluminum dust?
Usually they spray coal ash, but they can spray whatever they like since there is no
transparency or accountability and the decarbonization program intersects with the
depopulation program.
Interestingly - coal ash is a major source of uranium 238 and arsenic which we found
signioficantly elevated in our patients’ urine back in 2017.
Now you know why.
I may have to consider it as a uranium source - in addition to phosphate-fertilizer loaded soil
dust and coal ash from power plants and private home heating.
“Bill Gates is known for his engineering-for-everything mentality, his preference for purely
technological solutions and his blind spots when it comes to questioning the logic of
capitalism. Nearly every solution Gates proposes for the climate centers on innovation” by
entrepreneurs, driven by the promise of profits. But hidden behind his carefully cultivated
persona of detached curiosity on climate solutions are significant financial interests in fossil
fuel extraction”. This would suggest an actual financial interest of Bill Gates in carbon
industry to flourish in contrast to his public decarbonization doctrine and solar
geoengineering just a means to increase earth’ absorption capacity for combustions of fossil
fuels. Would you agree on primary profit-interests or is it rather the philanthropic goal to
save human mankind which is driving Bill Gates in these kinds of investments?
Bill Gates is not after more profits and he is certainly not a supporter of Big Oil. He belongs
firmly in the decarbonization camp. More than anything he belongs in the depopulation camp.
He means well but goes about it the wrong way. The world’s problems cannot be solved
through technical fixes and scientific solutions, no more than human health can be gained by
swallowing pills or injecting vaccines. They can at most by us time. 51
As for the wealth he has been allowed to amass that’s because the system needs to concentrate
the wealth we produce in the hands of a few billionaires so it can be used against us. Bill
Gates didn’t create this system; he is merely a part of it and a beneficiary because his father
had a high ranking position in the depopulation lobby, which is why he uses his wealth to
fund the depopulation by vaccination program.
He has recently decided to get into the decarbonization game because sustainability is
impossible without depopulation and decarbonization in equal measure. And because he is
beginning to realize that the depopulation by vaccination strategy will not succeed, at least not
to the extent the system hoped it would succeed.
The question is about how to organize a green urban transition of such a scale in a relatively
short time, maximizing human potential & resources in a fair manner. Cities need time to
grow organically and to provide an esthetic, life-affirming and healthy ambience for people to
flourish. Another question I would have here: does it really make any sense to urbanize more.
I’m rather a believer in the smaller village which allows for human made environmental
pressures to dilute and to be remediated more easily.
I would prefer to live in the lap of nature too, but I suppose I would get bored after a while.
Furthermore, if 7.8 billion people have the same wish then there will be no nature left. The
entire planet would be a suburb. If cities learn to incorporate nature by building plenty of
parks and we get access to the great outdoors when we need it or want it, then there is no
reason why we couldn’t be happy in urban environments. The goal is anyhow to urbanize
70% of the global population by 2050 and the entire global population by 2100 for that is the
only way to return 50% of the planet’s landmass back to nature.
In contrast I’m very hard to get bored as my nervous system feels rather hypersensitive
producing an excess of noise and irritating questions and ideas constantly. My choice would
be the countryside and a self-sufficient village with an intact, non-corrupted social structure
oriented towards human need instead of profit. I’m also not a believer in a ruling class to far
away from the people and their real preoccupations like national governments or in the case
of CV19-agenda even a never elected but real self-legitimized “world government“ with all
the unattained atrocities committed for sake of the arbitrarily self-defined “common
good”. But this may be just a romantic transfiguration of real rural life.
We romanticize that which we do not know from real experience. A self-sufficient village
implies animal husbandry and agriculture or at least the growing of fruit and vegetables. I
doubt city folks want to return to that kind of life and from what I see country folks are
flooding into the cities to escape that sort of life. Besides the city folks of today are incapable
of watering a potted plant let alone return to animal husbandry.
Probably true. So, we will become rather a global city than a global village?
Precisely! UN sustainable goal 11 states that by 2050 two-thirds of mankind will live in
urban settings. The actual goal is much higher though. The UN says it's a projection but that
is code word for objective. There is no going back to the past. The planet can hardly bear the
current population in dense conurbations. It cannot possibly bear this huge population in selfsustaining villages. We would need three times the land surface we have. Living in self-52
sustaining village is a pipe dream. We can barely make ends meet with industrial agricultural
practices and lots of synthetic fertilizers, which is why agriculture is moving inside controlled
environments.
It surely is a very complex issue
Now you are beginning to understand just how difficult it is to steer humanity ahead and keep
people from killing each other. Once you imagine yourself in a position of power and have to
come up with a better way it becomes clear just how difficult this is and you gain empathy for
those in power.
So you would say our current plandemickers deserved a little more respect from us for
masterminding our future or at least attempting to do so.
Yes. It is an attempt to shoot all birds with one stone with the least possible suffering and
casualties. The best there can be in the era of secrecy and deception. But we can do better than
that when the truth is blowing in our sails.
Further urbanization is prompted in order to spare traffic and reducing CO2? Are there any
official documents open to the public about this plan? And how fast will they proceed with
actions to fulfill it? They reckon the maximal global population roughly 4 billion to reach
sustainability. That implies human mankind would have to be reduced by some 48% from the
actual 7.8 Billion. Did the UN abandon the concept of maximum 9 Billion? 48% reduction in
40 years looks quite ambitious to me. What will be the major means for executing the dirty
part. Vaccines are expected to reduce only 10-15 %.
There are plenty of official documents on this subject not least of all the UN’s urbanization
documents. Once the depopulation by vaccination strategy fails, around the 40% vaccination
rate mark in the G20 nations, and the decarbonization by plandemic strategy is uncovered as
fake by 50% of the global population, the system will engage its next strategy, depopulation
and decarbonization by natural cataclysms that are actually mantaclysms, in other words manmade. The system will use something like methane clouds released from the melting
permafrost as a natural threat in order to move hundreds of millions off the land and into a
new generation of sustainable cities that will be built by climate migrants, some real while
most victims of mantaclysms. The Californian and Australian forest fires are two such
mantaclysms that represent test runs. We will see a lot more so-called wild fires in the near
future that will actually be mantaclysms and not natural in origin.
The mantaclysms of killer methane clouds or out-of-control “wild” fires will be created, I
suspect, by using the lasers that are currently being deployed in orbit by private companies
and state actors. Although the methane clouds will be modest they will be portrayed by the
fake media as a global threat to the lives of billions and no one will be any wiser; just as a
non-existent virus is currently portrayed as a global killer. The fires will need no spin since
we all know fire’s destructive potential.
The system has started preparing for mass displacement of people by acquiring large chunks
of land. Bill Gates has recently become the largest landowner in the US in preparation for
this. He will use his land to house millions of climate migrants in sustainable cities the 53
migrants themselves will build. So, get ready to see the world shook by man-made cataclysms
that will be sold as natural, followed by the largest displacement of people from the land and
across borders in human history, and the creation of sustainable cities with cheap climate
migrant labor. I suspect this will start happening in about five years.
Biden wants to triple protected lands. How do you think he will accomplish this? Through
mantaclysms, of course. Biden wants to set aside 30% of all federal land for
conservation. That means tens of millions will have to be moved off the land forcibly and
crowded into cities. Now you understand the fires in California. The UN did not abandon the
goal to urbanize the global population. Why do you think laser satellites are being deployed
into low orbit? 145 such satellites were launched into space just last week. They will use them
to set fire to areas they want cleared of people and will blame the fires on global warming, as
they did in Australia, or on overextended power lines, as they did in California. But the era of
man-made cataclysms - or mantaclysms, as I like to call them - will begin in a few years.
Vaccines will be blamed for 10% reduction while the rest will be blamed on global warming
and pandemics. In reality people will die by their own immune systems turned on them by
the current covid-19 vaccines. No one will admit it though.
Do you think, he wants to protect more land for real sustainability or does this just serve as a
pretext for concentrating people in crowded cities and hereby depopulating them.
Both! The efforts to urbanize the global population are ongoing. The fires in California and
Australia were the first attempts to use man-made cataclysms to force the people off the
land. The Americans tried it earlier with coercion but did not succeed. A billion people will
be displaced by climate change by 2030" predicts (plans) the World Economic Forum. Now
you know how many people they will forcibly move into cities in the next 9 years through
mantaclysms. The Americans are getting ready to mass incarcerate people. Global fascism is
upon us. As I have said, Trump was removed from office through a phony election to return
the US to the decarbonization program.
How can it be that these people are so convinced of their actions and that they can act in such
a disrespectful and criminal manner without any liability? Nobody seems to be really capable
of stopping them or at least force them to disclose their considerations and objectives? To
make them subject to public debate at the very least.
Welcome to geopolitics where everything is above the law and anyone who undermines
human life is handsomely rewarded.
I understand. In how far are your estimations in accord with official valuations of the UN, the
WEF and environmental organizations?
The estimates of how many people will die from “pandemics” and “cataclysms” will become
much higher once the system has its lasers in orbit and can start to cause man-made
cataclysms. But one thing is clear, come hell or high water the system will try to reduce the
global population to fewer than 4 billion souls by the end of this century since that is the
maximum sustainable population.54
So, in your opinion - no vicious intent from their side. They’re sincerely convinced to do the
right thing, there’s no alternative, people’s will cannot be considered or even heard. It seems
to me like an incredible amount of unscrupulousness, narcissism and arrogance irradiating
from such attitudes and behaviors.
Yes, they are convinced they are saving the planet from mankind and are saving man from
man. And they are right. However, they do it by unnecessary means. My plan would not
involve genocide. They will sacrifice as many people as it takes and will not bat an eyelid.
Unless somebody stops them from doing this. Just can’t see who this should be.
תגובות